Tennessee House Bill HB1770

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/24
• Refer: 1/11/24
• Refer: 1/29/24
• Engrossed: 2/6/24
• Enrolled: 3/12/24
• Passed: 3/27/24
• Chaptered: 4/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2, Chapter 11 and Title 4, Chapter 29, relative to the state election commission.

Impact

The implementation of HB 1770 is expected to lead to significant changes in state laws regarding the operation of the state election commission and other newly established agencies. By mandating the termination of these entities by a specific date, the bill creates a framework that allows for future assessments of the necessity and functioning of such bodies. This could result in a major overhaul of how elections are regulated and managed within the state, potentially streamline processes, and save public resources.

Summary

House Bill 1770 seeks to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically targeting the structure and longevity of the state election commission and various governmental entities. The bill proposes a termination date of June 30, 2032 for the state election commission and any other governmental bodies created in 2030. This legislative move signifies a shift towards reassessing and restructuring state agencies for greater efficiency and appropriateness in the evolving governance landscape in Tennessee.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 1770 appears to be mixed. Supporters of the bill argue that eliminating outdated or unnecessary governmental entities could improve efficiency and accountability in public service. However, there are concerns among critics that such drastic measures may potentially destabilize critical oversight functions within elections. This raises questions about maintaining robust electoral integrity in Tennessee, particularly during a time when election-related scrutiny is heightened.

Contention

Notably, points of contention include the implications of terminating the state election commission. Critics suggest that such a move may weaken the state's election oversight, especially in the context of maintaining public trust and ensuring fair democratic processes. The discussion raises broader concerns about the balance between reducing government bureaucracy and preserving adequate regulatory mechanisms for proper governance in electoral matters.