Tennessee House Bill HB1868

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/22/24
• Refer: 1/25/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39, relative to firearms.

Impact

The passage of HB1868 could significantly impact state laws governing firearm purchases and accessories. With the introduction of a mandatory waiting period for specific items, the bill aims to address the potential misuse of firearm accessories that can augment the lethality of firearms. Such a regulation may lead to a re-evaluation of current practices within gun dealerships and might prompt discussions on the effectiveness of this waiting period in preventing gun violence.

Summary

House Bill 1868 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 39, to introduce new regulations concerning the sale of certain firearm accessories. The bill prohibits gun dealers from delivering trigger cranks, bump stocks, and other devices that accelerate the rate of fire of firearms until a waiting period of seventy-two hours has passed from the time of the initial sale attempt. This measure is drafted with the intent to enhance public safety amid concerns regarding the accessibility of rapid-fire devices to individuals.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB1868 appears to be polarized, reflecting a broader national debate on gun control. Proponents advocate for the bill as a necessary step towards more responsible firearm ownership and public safety, emphasizing the importance of regulating devices that can increase fire rates. Conversely, opponents may argue that the bill infringes upon Second Amendment rights and could be seen as an unnecessary additional layer of regulation that hampers lawful gun ownership.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding HB1868 include discussions regarding the practical implications of a seventy-two-hour waiting period. Critics may argue about the potential for this requirement to inconvenience law-abiding gun owners and question its effectiveness in truly mitigating firearm-related incidents. The debate may also touch on the political implications of restricting access to firearm accessories versus balancing the need for public safety measures.