Tennessee House Bill HB1931

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24
• Refer: 1/25/24
• Refer: 2/21/24
• Refer: 2/27/24
• Engrossed: 3/7/24
• Enrolled: 3/15/24
• Passed: 3/28/24
• Chaptered: 4/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 38; Title 39 and Title 40, relative to certain local regulations

Impact

The passage of HB 1931, if enacted, would significantly impact local governments' regulatory authority concerning law enforcement practices. With this amendment, any local ordinances that restrict traffic stops on the grounds outlined in the bill would be rendered null and void. Proponents argue that this is necessary for public safety and ensuring that law enforcement can effectively carry out their duties without interference from local policies. Consequently, local governments will need to carefully evaluate their existing policies to ensure compliance with this new state law.

Summary

House Bill 1931 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated concerning local regulations, particularly addressing the authority of local governments in relation to law enforcement traffic stops. The bill explicitly prohibits any local governmental entity or official from adopting policies that would limit the ability of law enforcement agencies to conduct traffic stops based on reasonable suspicion of violations of state or federal laws. This legislation reflects an intent to standardize law enforcement practices across the state and reduce any local barriers that might hinder their operational authority.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB 1931 appears to be divided. Supporters, predominantly found among conservative legislators, emphasize the necessity of maintaining order and supporting law enforcement's right to operate without local limitations. In contrast, some advocacy groups and opponents voice concerns about the implications for local governance and the potential for overreach by state authority at the expense of local nuances that may be vital for community safety and regulation.

Contention

A key point of contention revolves around the balance of power between state and local governments. Opponents of HB 1931 argue that the bill undermines local control, potentially diminishing communities' abilities to address specific local needs. They fear that standardized enforcement practices may not adequately reflect the diverse circumstances and challenges faced by different communities, leading to a one-size-fits-all approach in law enforcement that may not always be beneficial.