Tennessee House Bill HB2459

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Refer: 2/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 40, Chapter 11, relative to failure to appear.

Impact

The proposed changes brought forth by HB2459 will ensure that more rigorous measures are in place for dealing with defendants who do not attend their court hearings, particularly for violent and sexual felony offenses. By requiring listing in a fugitive database, the bill reinforces the responsibility of the judicial system to follow up on such cases swiftly, potentially improving public safety and increasing the efficacy of law enforcement in apprehending individuals who evade accountability.

Summary

House Bill 2459 aims to amend existing Tennessee law under Title 40, Chapter 11, specifically addressing the consequences of a defendant's failure to appear in court. The bill introduces provisions that require a defendant who fails to appear for a felony charge defined as violent or sexual by the court to be listed on state or federal fugitive databases within ten days following their non-appearance. This amendment emphasizes the state's efforts to enhance tracking and accountability for serious offenses.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HB2459 appears focused on enhancing law enforcement's ability to manage serious criminal offenses. While supporters advocate for stronger measures to ensure that individuals charged with violent or sexual crimes remain accountable, some concerns may arise regarding the implications of rapid listing on databases and the due process rights of defendants. Overall, stakeholders are likely to express a mix of support for accountability and caution regarding procedural fairness.

Contention

Points of contention related to HB2459 may center around the swift placement of defendants on fugitive lists and the legal implications for individuals who may have valid reasons for non-appearance. Critics may argue that the bill could lead to unintended consequences, such as harsher penalties for those who might not have been able to attend court for legitimate reasons. The balance between ensuring public safety and maintaining just judicial processes is likely to be a significant aspect of the ongoing discussion surrounding this legislation.