AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 47, relative to the use of artificial intelligence.
If passed, HB2707 would significantly impact how AI-generated content is treated under state law. It would mandate disclosures for any AI-generated material, including images, videos, and written work, irrespective of consent from the individual whose likeness or work is involved. This requirement aims to enhance transparency and prevent consumer deception, aligning with existing regulations under the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act. It is intended to protect individuals' rights and prevent misuse of their likenesses and writings in AI applications.
House Bill 2707 aims to amend the Tennessee Code relating to the use of artificial intelligence (AI) by establishing regulations for content generated using AI. The bill introduces specific definitions for terms such as 'artificial intelligence,' 'generative artificial intelligence,' and 'disclosure,' highlighting the aspects of machine-based systems that can make predictions, recommendations, or decisions with minimal human intervention. The bill places obligations on individuals and entities to disclose when content has been generated using AI, specifically if it involves the likeness of another individual or the work of an individual other than the listed author.
Overall, HB2707 is poised to create a framework for regulating the use of artificial intelligence in content creation within Tennessee. Its focus on disclosure is a step towards acknowledging the implications of AI technology on personal rights and consumer protection. As discussions continue, the bill's supporters and opponents will need to navigate the challenges of regulation in an innovative technological landscape.
Notable points of contention surrounding HB2707 include the balance between fostering innovation and protecting personal rights. Some stakeholders may view the disclosure requirements as burdensome, potentially stifling the creative use of AI technology in content creation. Concerns might also arise regarding enforcement mechanisms and the potential for increased litigation over non-compliance, especially in the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence. Critics may argue that the bill could inadvertently hinder the growth of AI advancements in Tennessee.