AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 39; Title 40; Title 47, Chapter 18 and Title 55, relative to remote vehicle disabling technology.
If passed, HB2741 would represent a significant shift in state law, aiming to enhance regulation surrounding vehicle safety and technology. The legislation would ensure that remote disabling technology is not utilized in ways that could jeopardize the rights and safety of vehicle owners. The stringent penalties associated with the violation of this bill would aim to deter misconduct in the automotive market and protect consumers from unauthorized disablings of their vehicles.
House Bill 2741 seeks to amend several titles in the Tennessee Code Annotated, focusing specifically on remote vehicle disabling technology. The bill defines remote vehicle disabling technology as any device or application that can deactivate a motor vehicle's operation when enabled, and it prohibits the manufacture, distribution, or use of such technology if it can be activated by vehicle manufacturers or government entities. Violating these provisions would result in a Class E felony, carrying significant penalties, including fines and potential license revocation for offenders in the automotive industry.
The sentiment around HB2741 appears to be largely supportive, particularly among consumer protection advocates who are concerned about unauthorized access to vehicles. However, there are likely concerns from automotive businesses regarding the implications of such strict regulations on technology deployment and innovation. The strong penalties may be viewed positively by those who prioritize safety, while others may perceive them as excessive and potentially stifling to technological advancement in vehicle management.
Notable points of contention regarding HB2741 include the balance between safety and technological freedom. Proponents argue that the bill protects consumers from potential threats associated with remote disabling capabilities, emphasizing the need for safe regulation. Conversely, critics may raise concerns about unintended consequences that stifle industry innovation or the potential for overreach in regulating technology that could have legitimate uses in vehicle management and theft prevention.