Tennessee House Bill HB2885

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/24
• Refer: 2/5/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 54 and Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13, relative to firearms accessories.

Impact

The proposed amendments in HB2885 could lead to significant consequences for how firearms accessories are regulated in the state. By formally recognizing bipods as accessories, the bill aims to ensure that these items are included in licensing and compliance checks, thereby enhancing safety protocols associated with firearms. As a result, manufacturers and retailers may need to adjust their production and sales practices to comply with the new regulations, while consumers may face a more defined set of rules regarding the use of firearms accessories.

Summary

House Bill 2885 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated by specifically including 'bipods' in the list of regulated firearms accessories under Title 4, Chapter 54 and Title 39, Chapter 17, Part 13. The addition of bipods is designed to clarify the definition and regulation of firearms accessories, ensuring that all relevant items are appropriately categorized within state law. This change is part of a broader initiative to update and refine the regulations surrounding firearms and their accessories in Tennessee.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding HB2885 appears to be one of cautious support among lawmakers who prioritize firearm safety and regulation. While some legislators view the inclusion of bipods as a necessary step towards comprehensive firearms accessory legislation, others may express concerns regarding the potential overreach of regulations. However, there seems to be a consensus on the importance of clarifying what constitutes a regulated accessory to improve public safety standards.

Contention

There are notable points of contention surrounding HB2885, mainly revolving around the implications of including bipods as controlled accessories. Opponents might argue that such regulations can lead to unnecessary restrictions on firearm accessories, potentially affecting law-abiding citizens' rights to own and use such items. The bill's discussions likely addressed concerns over how these regulations would impact recreational users versus those with malicious intent, raising questions about the balance between safety and personal freedom in firearm ownership.