Tennessee House Bill HJR0045

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/20/23
• Failed: 3/14/23

Caption

A RESOLUTION to propose an amendment to Article II, Section 3, Article III, Sections 4 and 17, Article VI, Sections 3, 4, 5, and 13, and Article VII, Sections 1, 3, and 4, of the Constitution of Tennessee, relative to term limits.

Impact

If passed, HJR0045 will significantly alter the landscape of governance in Tennessee by ensuring that no public official can serve indefinitely. This change is aimed at promoting political turnover and reducing the likelihood of entrenched political power. Advocates argue that such term limits would enhance accountability and bring fresh perspectives into governmental functions, thereby serving the interests of the public more effectively.

Summary

HJR0045 is a resolution proposing amendments to several articles of the Tennessee Constitution, specifically relating to term limits for various elected officials. The resolution intends to impose restrictions on the length of time individuals can serve in public office, with specific limits set for members of the House of Representatives and Senate, the Governor, the Secretary of State, and judges at different judicial levels. Notably, it proposes a limit of sixteen years for state legislators, two terms for the Governor, and terms limits for judges, among other provisions.

Contention

There are anticipated points of contention surrounding HJR0045. Critics of term limits often argue that such measures can disrupt legislative continuity and undermine the effectiveness of experience in governance. There may be concerns regarding who gets to influence this potential shift in power dynamics, particularly regarding the motivations behind introducing term limits. Opponents may fear that term limits could marginalize experienced lawmakers and judges who have built substantial expertise, ultimately affecting the quality of governance. The discussion on this bill is expected to bring both supporters and detractors into debate about the balance between maintaining experienced leadership and refreshing the political landscape.