Tennessee House Bill HJR0131

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Refer: 2/1/23
• Refer: 2/14/23
• Refer: 2/22/23
• Engrossed: 3/7/23
• Enrolled: 4/12/24
• Passed: 4/22/24

Caption

A RESOLUTION to address and establish the declared public policy of the State of Tennessee relative to the right of the citizens and those within the boundaries of this State to keep, bear, and wear arms.

Impact

If enacted, HJR0131 would significantly affect the legal landscape around gun ownership in Tennessee. It envisions declaring that any attempts to regulate or restrict gun rights by the federal government or other states are not only unwelcome but also contrary to the public policy of the state. This could lead to Tennessee adopting a more assertive stance regarding state sovereignty, particularly in how it interprets and enforces the Second Amendment within its jurisdiction. Furthermore, the resolution may result in conflicts with federal regulations or laws that seek to impose limitations on gun rights.

Summary

HJR0131 is a joint resolution introduced in the Tennessee General Assembly that aims to reaffirm the right of citizens within the state to keep, bear, and wear arms. The resolution declares that this right is inherent and pre-exists any laws or constitutions, both state and federal. By referencing the Second Amendment and recent Supreme Court decisions reinforcing individual rights to bear arms, HJR0131 seeks to establish a clear position against any federal or state infringements on these rights. The resolution underscores the belief that such rights are fundamental to the citizens of Tennessee and must be protected against potential regulatory overreach by other states or the federal government.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HJR0131 is largely polarized. Supporters view the resolution as a necessary reaffirmation of individual liberties and a resistance to increased federal control over gun rights. They argue that the bill strengthens Tennessee's commitment to the Constitution and its foundational beliefs concerning personal freedoms. Conversely, opponents of HJR0131 may see it as an unnecessary provocation that might encourage vigilantism or escalate tensions around gun legislation, questioning the efficacy of declaring such rights against federal authority.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding HJR0131 is its implications for the relationship between state and federal governance, particularly on matters concerning the Second Amendment. Critics might argue that while reinforcing the protection of rights is crucial, the resolution could further complicate legal interactions between state and federal laws, particularly regarding law enforcement practices. The resolution's assertion that it could nullify actions taken by other states or the federal government raises questions about legal practicality and could lead to significant legal challenges if such conflicts arise.