AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4, Chapter 29 and Title 68, Chapter 211, Part 1, relative to the underground storage tanks and solid waste disposal control board.
The implications of SB0066 are significant for the functioning of the underground storage tanks and solid waste disposal control board. By enforcing stricter attendance rules, the bill seeks to promote accountability and commitment among board members. This legislative change could lead to a more engaged and effective governance structure, which is essential for overseeing regulations related to underground storage and waste disposal—a critical issue regarding environmental safety and public health in Tennessee.
Senate Bill 66 (SB0066) aims to amend certain provisions within the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically concerning the governance of the underground storage tanks and solid waste disposal control board. The primary focus of this bill is to introduce changes in the membership requirements of the board. Notably, the bill introduces a new regulation that mandates any voting member who misses more than fifty percent (50%) of scheduled meetings in a calendar year will be automatically removed from their position. This is designed to ensure a more active participation from board members and enhance the effectiveness of the board's operations.
Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB0066 appears to be supportive, particularly among those advocating for streamlined governance in environmental oversight. The bill has gained a positive reception during discussions, mainly due to its focus on improving the board's performance through enhanced member attendance requirements. There is a general consensus that effective management of underground storage tanks is essential for preventing environmental hazards, and the bill's provisions align well with these objectives.
While SB0066 is largely viewed as a positive step towards effective governance, there may be some concern regarding the potential for this attendance requirement to unintentionally disqualify necessary expertise from the board. Critics may argue that members with important insights on solid waste management could be removed due to legitimate reasons for absence, which could lead to a depletion of valuable knowledge within the board. Nonetheless, the bill emphasizes the need for active participation to enhance decision-making and oversight in crucial environmental areas.