Tennessee Senate Bill SB0803

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 39; Title 54; Title 57; Title 62; Title 67; Title 68; Title 69 and Title 70, relative to litter.

Impact

The bill's amendments will have direct implications for litter enforcement within the state of Tennessee. By mandating certified mail for notifications, the bill seeks to provide stronger proof of notification to offenders and ensure they are fully informed about the charges against them. This legislative change may lead to more stringent enforcement of litter laws as it establishes a clearer communication protocol between regulatory bodies and offenders. Additionally, it may assist in tracking compliance and recurring offenses more effectively.

Summary

Senate Bill 803 (SB0803) aims to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically addressing issues related to litter. This bill proposes changes to the notification process for suspected offenders, shifting the delivery method from a standard letter to certified mail, requiring return receipt requested. The intent is to ensure that notifications are formally received, thereby improving accountability among violators and enhancing the enforcement of litter-related regulations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding SB0803 appears positive, as it reflects an effort to bolster environmental regulations and public welfare. Legislators advocating for the bill believe that the changes will provide the tools necessary for effective litter management and enforcement, ultimately contributing to a cleaner environment. However, there may be some debate regarding the implications for administrative processes, particularly concerning the increase in resource allocation for certified mail notifications.

Contention

While the bill receives support for enhancing litter regulation enforcement, there may be concerns regarding the logistics and costs associated with the mandated use of certified mail. Critics may argue that this requirement could lead to increased bureaucratic processes and financial burdens on regulatory bodies. Thus, the balance between effective enforcement and practical implementation of such regulations is a potential point of contention among lawmakers and stakeholders.