Tennessee Senate Bill SB1086

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Engrossed: 3/21/23
• Enrolled: 4/28/23
• Passed: 5/17/23
• Chaptered: 5/24/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8, Chapter 25 and Title 8, Chapter 35, relative to retirement.

Impact

The implementation of SB1086 is expected to have a significant impact on local government financing and pension administration. By allowing local governments to maintain these benefit plans under specific contribution limits, it seeks to ensure that the local governments can provide retirement benefits while also adhering to regulatory constraints. Furthermore, the requirement for periodic audits emphasises transparency and accountability in managing these funds, reflecting an effort to balance fiscal responsibility with employee benefits.

Summary

Senate Bill 1086 aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding retirement plans, specifically targeting defined benefit pension plans established by local government employers. The bill facilitates the continuation of these pension plans, provided that the total combined employer and employee contributions do not exceed seven percent of the employee's salary. This change intends to create a more sustainable framework for local government pension systems while ensuring compliance with both state and federal regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1086 is predominantly positive, with many lawmakers expressing support for the bill as a necessary measure to protect local government employees' retirement benefits. The proposal was favorably received during discussions, evidenced by the strong voting majority, where 82 voted in favor compared to only 5 against. This indicates a bipartisan acknowledgment of the importance of adequate retirement benefits for local government workers, even as discussions around fiscal policy and budget constraints persist.

Contention

While the overall sentiment is favorable, a point of contention may arise regarding the long-term sustainability of the contribution limits set by the bill. Some critics argue that the seven percent cap may not be sufficient to meet future pension obligations, potentially leading to funding shortfalls. Additionally, the mandate for local governments to conduct audits may impose an administrative burden, raising concerns among smaller municipalities about their capacity to comply. Nonetheless, proponents argue that these measures are essential for maintaining a healthy retirement system.