Tennessee Senate Bill SB1147

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/31/23
• Engrossed: 4/18/23
• Enrolled: 4/28/23
• Passed: 5/17/23
• Chaptered: 5/24/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 66 and Title 68, relative to private property rights.

Impact

If enacted, SB1147 would significantly reshape how Tennessee interacts with international sustainability frameworks and directives. The bill imposes limitations on state and local governments, essentially shielding citizens from regulations that might arise under politically sensitive agendas. Notably, it aims to prevent any expenditure or agreements made with non-governmental or intergovernmental organizations that promote these international policies. As a result, the legislation would alter the operational landscape for local governments in addressing environmental and developmental issues.

Summary

Senate Bill 1147, also known as the Private Property Rights Protection Act, seeks to amend various titles within the Tennessee Code Annotated to safeguard private property rights against potential overreach from local governmental entities. The bill explicitly prohibits the state and its political subdivisions from adopting any policies that would infringe upon or restrict private property rights, particularly those arising from international agreements or directives traced back to entities like the United Nations. This includes well-known frameworks such as Agenda 21 and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1147 appears to be mixed, with strong support from those who prioritize individual property rights and are wary of international influence on local governance. Proponents argue that this bill is crucial for maintaining local autonomy and protecting citizens from what they perceive as external pressure to conform to international standards. However, critics express concerns that the bill may hinder local governments' ability to implement effective policies addressing community-specific needs, particularly in areas related to sustainability and environmental planning.

Contention

The primary contention derived from SB1147 stems from its potential impact on local governance. Supporters laud it as an essential step for the protection of private property rights, fearing that international agendas could compromise local autonomy. Contrarily, opponents argue it could create challenges for local governments aiming to address environmental and public health concerns appropriately. This ongoing debate reflects broader tensions regarding state versus local control and the implications of adhering to or rejecting international guidelines on sustainable development.