Tennessee Senate Bill SB1360

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/23

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 8-7-230, relative to salaries of criminal investigators.

Impact

If enacted, this bill will result in a significant adjustment to the compensation framework for criminal investigators in Tennessee. By tying their salaries to that of the district attorney general and allowing for gradual increases based on years worked, the bill aims to enhance the attractiveness of these positions, potentially aiding recruitment and retention in law enforcement. The structured salary schedule provides predictability in compensation adjustments, which could improve job satisfaction among criminal investigation roles.

Summary

Senate Bill 1360 proposes an amendment to Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Section 8-7-230, which addresses the salaries of criminal investigators. The bill stipulates that all criminal investigators hired after July 1, 1994, will be compensated starting at thirty-five percent (35%) of the annual salary of the district attorney general. This percentage will gradually increase over a 20-year span until reaching fifty-five percent (55%). The bill provides a detailed salary schedule for entry level and subsequent increases based on years of service, ensuring that compensation reflects experience and tenure.

Conclusion

Overall, SB1360 appears to be a forward-looking measure aimed at revitalizing compensation for criminal investigators in Tennessee, reflecting an understanding of the essential role these professionals play in the justice system. This bill also serves as a benchmark for how law enforcement compensation is structured statewide, potentially influencing future discussions on public sector pay in higher education and public health sectors.

Contention

While the bill serves to improve salary standards for criminal investigators, it may also spark discussions regarding budgeting and resource allocation within state and local law enforcement agencies. Opponents may voice concerns over the long-term financial impact on state budgets and whether these adjustments compete with other essential public services or necessitate reallocating funds from other areas of law enforcement or public safety initiatives.