AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 20 and Title 33, relative to opioids.
Impact
The proposed amendments from SB 1677 are expected to have implications on the regulatory framework governing the sale and distribution of opioids. By updating the language to formally recognize The Kroger Co. in addition to K-VA-T Food Stores, the legislation could foster a more comprehensive regulatory environment that holds large pharmacy retailers accountable for their role in managing and distributing opioids. This adjustment may also reflect efforts to ensure that large chains adhere to the same standards as smaller local stores, potentially leading to enhanced monitoring and oversight mechanisms necessary for combating opioid misuse.
Summary
Senate Bill 1677 amends certain provisions of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to the regulation of opioids. Specifically, the bill updates the language in two sections to include 'The Kroger Co.' alongside 'K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc.' in references about the distribution and legal status of opioids. The primary aim of this amendment appears to be to clarify or enhance the regulation associated with these entities regarding their operations with prescription medications, specifically opioids. This change is important as it seeks to adapt state regulations to contemporary business practices in the pharmacy and retailing of drugs, particularly in addressing issues linked with opioid distribution and management.
Sentiment
Sentiments surrounding SB 1677 seem generally supportive, particularly from legislators focusing on the opioid crisis and the need for stringent regulations on prescription medications. There is a recognition of the importance of including major retailers, like Kroger, in the framework of opioid regulation as they hold significant market share and influence. Nonetheless, specific points of contention may arise among stakeholders who argue that additional oversight may be required or that the measures taken do not go far enough in addressing the opioid epidemic comprehensively.
Contention
The major contention noted with SB 1677 revolves around the effectiveness of merely updating the language to include national chains in opioid regulations. Critics may argue that while this is a step forward, the bill does not provide robust solutions to the epidemic, which may require more comprehensive strategies or stricter regulations concerning prescription practices. The inclusion of larger entities raises questions about the accountability of corporations versus local operations in the broader fight against opioid misuse and addiction.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 10; Title 33; Title 36; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 49; Title 50 and Title 70, relative to firearms.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 8; Title 10; Title 33; Title 36; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 49; Title 50 and Title 70, relative to firearms.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 29; Title 33; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 43; Title 45; Title 50; Title 53; Title 63; Title 67; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to cannabis.
AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 29; Title 33; Title 38; Title 39; Title 40; Title 41; Title 43; Title 45; Title 50; Title 53; Title 63; Title 67; Title 68 and Title 71, relative to cannabis.