Tennessee Senate Bill SB1915

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/24
• Chaptered: 5/1/24
• Passed: 5/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 62 and Title 63, relative to occupational licensing.

Impact

If enacted, SB1915 is expected to impact statues related to occupational licensing across various professions. By providing clarity on how previous convictions relate to specific occupations, it could potentially lead to more equitable hiring practices and reduce discrimination against individuals with criminal backgrounds. The bill will create a clearer pathway for those seeking licenses and employment, increasing overall workforce participation rates among formerly incarcerated individuals.

Summary

Senate Bill 1915 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated concerning occupational licensing by prohibiting licensing authorities from using vague terms, such as 'good moral character' and 'character and fitness,' without explicit explanation linking a prior conviction to the relevant occupation. This change seeks to ensure that applicants with prior convictions are judged more fairly and that licensure decisions are made transparently. Proponents believe this will lower barriers for individuals with criminal records, thus aiding their reintegration into the workforce while protecting public interests through clear standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1915 appears to be generally positive among advocacy groups and supporters who view it as a progressive step towards reforming the occupational licensing process. These supporters argue it will provide individuals with past convictions a fairer chance at employment. Conversely, some opponents express concerns about potential risks to public safety, suggesting that a more lenient approach to licensing may not adequately protect consumers and employers. This division reflects broader societal debates surrounding criminal justice reform and employment rights.

Contention

A point of contention regarding SB1915 is how the bill balances individual rights against public safety concerns. Proponents emphasize the importance of making licensing processes more accessible to those with convictions to promote rehabilitation and reduce recidivism. In contrast, opponents worry that insufficient scrutiny of applicants with criminal histories could lead to risks in certain occupations where public trust is paramount, such as in healthcare or education. Thus, discussions around the bill highlight a fundamental tension between the goals of equity and the necessity of safeguarding public interests.