Tennessee Senate Bill SB1948

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/24
• Engrossed: 3/14/24
• Enrolled: 4/24/24
• Passed: 5/6/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 68 and Title 69, relative to water quality control.

Impact

The impact of SB1948 on state laws is primarily focused on the ease of permitting for local government entities involved in urgent infrastructure repairs. By removing the permit fees associated with specific aquatic resource alteration activities, the legislation aims to ensure that local authorities can act swiftly in maintaining or repairing critical infrastructure that could affect water quality and resource management. The anticipated outcome is a more streamlined process for local governments to undertake necessary actions without financial constraints related to permits.

Summary

Senate Bill 1948 is a legislative act aimed at amending several titles of the Tennessee Code Annotated to provide specific provisions related to water quality control. The bill introduces a new subsection that exempts local government entities from charging a permit application fee for general aquatic resource alteration permits necessary for emergency infrastructure repairs, specifically those that involve the replacement or maintenance of culverts. This change is significant in facilitating local governments' ability to respond quickly to infrastructure needs without the burden of additional fees.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1948 appears to be largely positive, as it is designed to support local governments in fulfilling their responsibilities regarding water quality management. This support aligns with the broader legislative goal of enhancing infrastructure resilience and ensuring that localities can maintain their aquatic resources effectively. Legislators backing the bill likely see it as a necessary step toward greater investment in public utilities and environmental stewardship.

Contention

Despite the general support for SB1948, potential points of contention may arise regarding the implications of exempting local governments from permit fees. Critics could argue that such exemptions might lead to a lack of regulatory oversight in aquatic resource management, potentially resulting in environmental degradation. Additionally, discussions may emerge about the balance between facilitating local responses to infrastructure issues and maintaining stringent environmental protections necessary for the safeguarding of natural resources.