AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 58, Chapter 2, Part 1, relative to executive orders.
The proposed changes seek to centralize authority with the governor while simultaneously requiring accountability through legislative oversight. By necessitating the general assembly's concurrence for the enforcement of penalties associated with executive orders, the bill aims to create a balance of power, ensuring that emergency measures are both effective and appropriately sanctioned by elected representatives. This increased oversight may enhance legislative scrutiny and public confidence in the state's emergency responses.
Senate Bill 1999 proposes amendments to Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 58, Chapter 2, Part 1, which governs executive orders during emergencies. The bill's primary aim is to modify the enforcement mechanisms and implications of state authority in the context of declared emergencies. It establishes that individuals violating certain executive orders, proclamations, or rules can be charged with a Class A misdemeanor if the governor specifies such penalties in their order and if the order has legislative approval via a joint resolution.
The discussions surrounding SB1999 are likely to center on the balance of power between the legislative and executive branches during times of emergency. Supporters might argue that the bill provides essential checks on executive power, preventing potential overreach by the governor in enacting sweeping emergency measures without accountability. Conversely, critics could contend that the legislation could impede timely responses to emergencies, given the need for legislative deliberation, thus compromising public safety and effective governance.