Tennessee Senate Bill SB2095

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/29/24
• Engrossed: 4/23/24
• Enrolled: 4/25/24
• Passed: 5/9/24
• Chaptered: 5/13/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 49, Chapter 7, relative to higher education research security.

Impact

The implementation of SB 2095 is set to impact the existing framework of higher education in Tennessee significantly, as it compels institutions to formalize their approach to research security. By requiring institutions to be proactive in safeguarding their academic outputs from foreign threats, the bill aligns higher education policies with national security considerations, thus changing how institutions conduct and manage research. The emphasis on compliance procedures and reporting will also necessitate potential changes in administrative operations and resource allocation within these institutions.

Summary

Senate Bill 2095 aims to enhance the security of academic research within public institutions of higher education in Tennessee. The bill mandates that each institution establish a research security policy to protect academic research from foreign adversaries. This policy must adhere to various legal and regulatory standards while fostering a culture of compliance with federal regulations, ensuring eligibility for federal funding, and addressing potential insider threats and export controls. Institutions are required to implement these policies by January 1, 2025, and to make them publicly accessible on their websites.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment around SB 2095 is generally supportive, particularly from those advocating for enhanced national security measures in higher education. Legislators and stakeholders involved in the discussion emphasize the necessity of protecting academic research, especially in a geopolitical landscape where foreign interference is a real threat. However, there are concerns regarding the implementation burden on institutions, particularly regarding the resources and frameworks they must develop to ensure compliance with the new regulations.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the balance between national security imperatives and academic freedom. Some critics could argue that the regulations imposed by the bill may stifle innovative research approaches or overemphasize governmental oversight, potentially impacting collaborative projects with international partners. As institutions work to establish their research security policies, there may be discussions surrounding the interpretation of what constitutes undue foreign influence and how to maintain open research environments while ensuring compliance with these new mandates.