AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2; Title 4; Title 8; Title 12; Title 13; Title 33; Title 34; Title 37; Title 40; Title 41; Title 45; Title 49; Title 52; Title 55; Title 56; Title 63; Title 67; Title 68; Title 71 and Chapter 1100 of the Public Acts of 2010, relative to the Tennessee Disability and Aging Act of 2024.
If passed, SB2098 would significantly impact state statutes relating to disability services and aging by restructuring the framework in which these services are delivered. It would involve the creation of new support systems like the Alzheimer’s disease and related dementia advisory council, and it mandates coordination among state entities to ensure equitable access to services across the state. This restructuring may lead to improved outcomes for older adults and individuals with disabilities, but also requires adequate funding and resources to achieve its goals.
SB2098 proposes the establishment of the Department of Disability and Aging to provide a comprehensive system of care and support services for older individuals and those with disabilities in Tennessee. This bill aims to improve the accessibility and quality of services available to these populations, addressing their distinct needs through the implementation of new programs. Additionally, it is intended to facilitate better coordination among existing services and resources, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of care provided to individuals who require long-term support.
The reception of SB2098 appears to be generally positive among advocates and organizations focused on aging and disability issues, as it promises to enhance care and service quality. However, some concerns have been expressed regarding the adequacy of funding to implement the broad range of programs proposed. Critics are wary that without sufficient resources, the bill could fall short of its intended effects, potentially leading to unmet needs among Tennessee’s vulnerable populations.
Notable points of contention surrounding SB2098 include concerns about its financial implications and the potential reliance on state funding that may not be guaranteed year-to-year. Additionally, there are apprehensions regarding the bill's ability to carry out its ambitious goals effectively, especially in the realm of ensuring that the services provided reflect the unique needs of the diverse communities throughout the state.