Tennessee Senate Bill SB2245

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Chaptered: 4/22/24
• Passed: 4/22/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 2, Chapter 10, relative to campaign finance.

Impact

By amending the notification procedure, SB2245 seeks to streamline the compliance process for candidates and election committees. This change is expected to facilitate quicker responses and may reduce the incidences of late report filings, as stakeholders will have immediate access to their reporting requirements through electronic notifications. Additionally, penalties for non-compliance have been adjusted to account for various methods of delivery, establishing a more equitable approach in applying civil penalties based on the actual receipt of notifications.

Summary

Senate Bill 2245, aimed at amending the Tennessee Code Annotated, focuses on campaign finance management for local public offices. The bill modifies the process of notifying candidates and committees about due reports, allowing for email notifications rather than solely relying on mail delivery. This change is intended to modernize communication methods within the electoral process, reflecting advancements in technology and the increasing reliance on digital means for information dissemination in campaign finance.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB2245 appears to be largely positive, with support from legislators who view the bill as a necessary update to the state’s campaign finance laws. Proponents argue that the changes will improve efficiency and transparency in the electoral process. However, there are concerns regarding accessibility for those who may not be as familiar with electronic communications, raising questions about potential exclusions for candidates who are less technologically savvy.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of shifting completely to electronic notifications and the potential for penalties to disproportionately affect candidates who may not have reliable access to technology or the internet. Critics argue that while modernization is essential, careful consideration must be given to ensure that all candidates are able to comply with the new requirements without facing undue hardship. The balance between efficient communication and the risk of disenfranchising certain groups remains a focal point of discussion as the bill progresses.