Tennessee Senate Bill SB2254

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Chaptered: 4/3/24
• Passed: 4/3/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 34, relative to conservatorship.

Impact

The legislative changes brought forth by SB2254 are projected to enhance the process of evaluating individuals under conservatorships, ensuring that examinations are performed regularly and that the results are appropriately documented and submitted to the court. This is expected to protect the rights of respondents and ensure that their needs are met more effectively. Additionally, by mandating that examiners provide sworn reports, the bill adds a layer of accountability to the examinations, thus improving trust and transparency in conservatorship proceedings.

Summary

Senate Bill 2254, aimed at amending the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding conservatorship, introduces significant changes to the procedures surrounding the examination and evaluation of individuals facing conservatorship. It establishes clearer definitions around terminology such as 'examination report' and 'examiner,' who can be either a physician or psychologist. The bill allows for the court to order examinations under specific circumstances, particularly when the individual has not been evaluated within ninety days prior to the filing of a petition, addressing potential gaps in the previous law that may have left individuals without timely assessments.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB2254 appears predominantly positive among lawmakers, particularly those advocating for mental health advocacy and support. Proponents argue that the bill is a step forward in ensuring that the rights and well-being of individuals facing conservatorship are prioritized. However, there remains cautious optimism as some stakeholders express the need for further discussions on how these changes will be implemented practically to avoid potential administrative burdens on the courts.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions regarding the adequacy of resources for implementing these changes efficiently. Critics raised concerns about whether the courts and healthcare providers will be equipped to handle an increased demand for evaluations and whether there are sufficient safeguards for the individuals subject to conservatorship. The legislation attempts to address these issues, but debate remains about how well the proposed measures will function in real-world situations.