Tennessee Senate Bill SB2269

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Engrossed: 3/25/24
• Enrolled: 4/29/24
• Passed: 5/28/24
• Chaptered: 5/31/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 71, relative to food assistance.

Impact

The impact of SB2269 is significant; it seeks to streamline the food assistance process, thereby potentially increasing the efficiency of service delivery to those in need. By pinpointing and aiming to mitigate regulatory obstacles, the bill could enhance the effectiveness of food assistance programs in Tennessee. The requirement for federal waivers may also open the door for changes that could simplify compliance and allow the state more flexibility in managing food assistance resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 2269 is a legislative measure aimed at amending the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 71, concerning food assistance programs. The bill mandates that the state department identify any federal regulations or state laws that hinder its ability to efficiently review and approve applications for food assistance, as well as disburse benefits to eligible individuals in a timely manner. To address these identified barriers, the department must seek necessary federal waivers and report its findings and the status of these applications to key legislative figures by the end of 2024.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB2269 has been supportive among those who see the necessity of improving food assistance programs, especially in light of increasing demand during economic challenges. Advocates for the bill highlight its proactive approach to identifying and alleviating barriers, suggesting it represents a commitment to better serve vulnerable populations. However, some stakeholders express caution, emphasizing the need to ensure that the pursuit of waivers does not compromise program integrity or accessibility.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB2269 include concerns related to how the bill's implementation may affect existing regulations that protect beneficiaries and the nuances involved in negotiating federal waivers. Critics argue that while streamlining processes is essential, careful consideration is needed to ensure that the quality of benefits and support does not diminish as a result of these changes. The discussion also touches on the balance between regulatory flexibility and maintaining necessary oversight to prevent misuse of the assistance programs.