Tennessee Senate Bill SB2325

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Engrossed: 3/11/24
• Enrolled: 3/26/24
• Passed: 4/11/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Chapter 289 of the Private Acts of 1976; as amended by Chapter 241 of the Private Acts of 1978; Chapter 92 of the Private Acts of 2000; and any other acts amendatory thereto, relative to the Scott County Attorney.

Impact

The proposed legislation will formalize the pay structure for the Scott County Attorney while introducing measures that ensure consistency in compensation without arbitrary changes. By locking in the salary and allowing for limited adjustments, the bill aims to promote fairness and stability for the role of the county attorney. The travel expense reimbursement is an added benefit that acknowledges the needs of the attorney in performing their duties effectively throughout the county and beyond.

Summary

Senate Bill 2325 aims to amend existing laws regarding the compensation of the Scott County Attorney by establishing a fixed annual salary of $65,000, effective September 1, 2024. This bill stipulates that the salary of the attorney cannot be altered during the current term except for potential adjustments based on cost-of-living increases presented to other county officials. Furthermore, the measure includes provisions for travel reimbursements for official county business and entitles the attorney to a subscription for online legal research, thereby modernizing the resources available to the county attorney.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB2325 appears to be supportive, especially among proponents who view this bill as a necessary enhancement to the job of the Scott County Attorney. The structured salary and additional resources like legal research access are perceived positively for improving the efficacy and efficiency of the attorney's operations. There may be limited opposition primarily from those who challenge the necessity of legislative approval or question if the set salary is appropriate for the scope of responsibilities.

Contention

One notable aspect of contention regarding SB2325 is the requirement for a two-thirds vote from the legislative body of Scott County for it to take effect. This stipulation may raise questions about local governance and the ability of the county officials to establish their own standards over such appointments. Additionally, the fixed salary could generate debate regarding the attorney's role in relation to the county’s broader financial situation, particularly if there are adjustments to funding for related public services in the future.