Tennessee Senate Bill SB2497

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/24
• Engrossed: 3/25/24
• Enrolled: 4/1/24
• Passed: 4/9/24
• Chaptered: 4/17/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 4; Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 54 and Title 65, relative to utilities.

Impact

The passing of SB 2497 is expected to have significant implications for local utilities, as it revises the obligations imposed by local governments on utility providers. By standardizing how much repair can be mandated after such disturbances, it aims to economize operations for utility companies and make utility maintenance more efficient. This could theoretically expedite maintenance processes and reduce interruptions in services to the public. However, the bill's broad language raises concerns regarding local jurisdiction and its ability to enforce specific instances of public safety that may necessitate more extensive repairs than proposed by the bill.

Summary

Senate Bill 2497 seeks to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated related to utilities, particularly focusing on regulations governing the repair of pavement or sidewalks in connection with utility inspections, installations, or connections. The bill sets a specific limitation on the extent to which local governments can require repairs to disturbed areas, capping the repair costs to a maximum of 200% of the surface area affected. This aims to streamline the process by which utility companies can work on infrastructure and limit the financial burden on them during necessary repairs when conducting their operations.

Sentiment

Opinions surrounding SB 2497 are divided amongst stakeholders. Proponents argue that the bill will enhance efficiency and lower costs for utility operations, facilitating smoother interactions between utility companies and local governments. This sentiment is rooted in the belief that limiting repair obligations serves the interests of both utility providers and consumers, ultimately improving service delivery. Conversely, opponents of SB 2497 express apprehension about the potential risks it poses to local governance. They argue that the cap on repair obligations undermines the ability of cities and counties to ensure that public safety and local needs are adequately met.

Contention

A central point of contention regarding SB 2497 is the balance between state directives and local control. Critics argue that the imposition of statewide regulations can diminish the capacity of municipal governments to respond effectively to unique local circumstances. This could lead to disjointed approaches to infrastructure repair across the state, where some communities may require more extensive repairs due to their specific conditions or preferences. The focus on capping repairs also raises concerns about cost-cutting measures that may compromise the quality and safety of the repairs conducted by utilities in the long run.