Tennessee Senate Bill SB2927

Tennessee 2023-2024 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/1/24

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 66, Chapter 2, relative to ownership of real property.

Impact

This legislation will specifically prohibit Chinese entities from owning or controlling real property in Tennessee, effectively barring them from direct involvement in the state's real estate market except for very limited circumstances. Existing Chinese entities with a property interest as of July 1, 2024, will be mandated to divest those interests within a two-year timeframe. Moreover, any new acquisition of property by such entities will be largely forbidden, except in minimal circumstances as defined by the bill. Such measures have raised concerns about the implications for international relations and investment flows.

Summary

Senate Bill 2927, introduced in Tennessee, aims to amend the state's laws regarding the ownership of real property by foreign entities, specifically those identified as 'Chinese entities.' The bill defines a 'Chinese entity' as encompassing various types of organizations and individuals connected to the People's Republic of China, including corporations and individuals who are not U.S. citizens or permanent residents. The primary objective of the bill is to restrict foreign ownership of land, especially near military installations, to safeguard national security and uphold democratic values.

Contention

During discussions, the bill has generated debate regarding its broader implications. Proponents argue that it is a necessary response to perceived threats from foreign influence, particularly from governments seen as hostile to U.S. interests. They advocate for the protection of local security and sovereignty. On the contrary, critics express concerns that the bill may discriminate against foreign investors, potentially affecting the state's economy by closing off substantial investment opportunities and infringing on property rights. The dichotomy between national security and economic openness remains a significant topic of discussion as the legislative process continues.