California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB561

Introduced
2/17/17  
Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
7/20/17  
Refer
7/20/17  
Report Pass
1/10/18  
Report Pass
1/10/18  
Refer
1/10/18  
Report Pass
1/22/18  
Report Pass
1/22/18  
Refer
1/24/18  
Refer
1/24/18  
Engrossed
1/30/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Refer
5/10/18  
Report Pass
6/21/18  
Refer
6/25/18  
Refer
6/26/18  

Caption

Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District: State audit.

Impact

The bill is set to have both practical and legal implications. It alters the existing framework that necessitates board members and voters to be residents of the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District. By accommodating nonresidents, the legislation aims to give property owners a say in district governance, ensuring their interests are considered, especially in decisions that may affect property values and local access to resources.

Summary

Senate Bill 561, introduced by Senators Gaines and Hill, brings significant changes to the Fallen Leaf Lake Community Services District by exempting nonresident voters from residency requirements for voting in district elections and serving on the district board. This provision allows individuals who either own property within the district or hold a valid Forest Service Recreation Permit to participate in governance, thereby broadening the demographic of eligible voters beyond just residents.

Sentiment

The reception to SB 561 has been mixed. Proponents argue that the bill is a step in the right direction for inclusivity and ensuring that the interests of property owners who are not residents are taken into account. Conversely, opponents express concerns that this move could dilute the voices of actual residents, potentially undermining the integrity of local governance and how local policies are shaped.

Contention

Key points of contention include the potential for conflicts arising from nonresidents participating in local election processes that primarily affect long-term residents of the community. Critics are worried that the motivations of nonresident voters may differ from those of residents, raising questions about whose interests are truly being represented. Additionally, the bill mandates a state audit of the community services district by August 2019, which will evaluate its financial condition and operational effectiveness, further highlighting concerns regarding governance and resource management.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB343

Public postsecondary education: holders of certain special immigrant visas.

CA AB2210

Public postsecondary education: community colleges: refugees and holders of certain special immigrant visas: exemption from paying nonresident tuition.

CA SB436

Community colleges: nonresident tuition.

CA AB3255

Postsecondary education: omnibus bill.

CA SB25

Elections: alternate ballot order: Los Angeles County pilot program.

CA AB91

Community colleges: exemption from nonresident tuition fee: residence near the California-Mexico border.

CA AB1998

Community colleges: nonresident tuition fees: Western Undergraduate Exchange.

CA AB1540

Postsecondary education: nonresident tuition: exemption.