Tennessee House Bill HB0275

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/25
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Refer: 2/10/25
• Engrossed: 2/20/25
• Enrolled: 3/6/25
• Passed: 3/28/25
• Chaptered: 4/4/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 4-1-412 and Title 4, Chapter 29, relative to the Tennessee monuments and memorials commission.

Impact

The passage of HB 0275 will have implications on how the Tennessee monuments and memorials commission operates. By amending existing law, the bill potentially streamlines commission activities and may alter the process by which monuments and memorials are considered by the state. This could lead to quicker resolutions on related matters or introduce new governance structures pertaining to state symbols, impacting how local historical sites and monuments are maintained or recognized.

Summary

House Bill 0275, officially titled as an act to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, addresses the governance and function of the Tennessee monuments and memorials commission. Specifically, the bill removes a subdivision from Tennessee Code Annotated, Section 4-29-246(a) that previously defined or regulated certain aspects of this commission. By making these amendments, the bill aims to clarify the responsibilities and authority of the commission in relation to the state's monuments and memorials, which are considered significant to Tennessee's cultural heritage and history.

Sentiment

Sentiments around the bill appear to lean toward support, especially among proponents who value the significance of preserving and managing monuments rightly reflective of Tennessee's heritage. While specific opposition was not noted in the committee discussions or voting records, the general discourse surrounding monumental integrity means that there might be apprehension about how changes can influence public perception or the preservation of certain historical narratives.

Contention

While the bill passed successfully with no votes against, the potential for contention lies in the definitions and responsibilities attributed to the commission following these amendments. Stakeholders in cultural preservation may express concerns about whether the removal of certain regulatory terms could lead to gaps in protection or oversight of sensitive historical sites, indicating a need for clarity on the bill's long-term effects on Tennessee's monument policies.