Tennessee House Bill HB0351

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 2/3/25
• Refer: 3/4/25
• Refer: 3/25/25
• Refer: 4/2/25
• Chaptered: 5/13/25
• Passed: 5/13/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 41, relative to electronic monitoring for work release.

Impact

The proposed changes encapsulated in HB 0351 indicate a significant alteration in how costs associated with electronic monitoring are allocated. Specifically, the execution of this bill will influence local government budgets and potentially ease the financial burden on the state by redistributing payment responsibilities. Such a change could affect the operational aspects of work release programs, encouraging local organizations to engage more actively in rehabilitation and employment initiatives that utilize these programs without the initial cost barrier of monitoring equipment.

Summary

House Bill 0351 aims to amend specific provisions in the Tennessee Code Annotated regarding electronic monitoring for inmates participating in work release programs. The bill specifies that if an inmate is released for paid employment, the cost of the electronic monitoring device will be deducted from the inmate's wages by the sheriff and paid directly to the provider by the county or state. Similarly, if the inmate is released for unpaid work, the organization utilizing the inmate's services will bear the cost of the monitoring device. This restructuring seeks to clarify and streamline the financial responsibility regarding electronic monitoring during work release scenarios.

Sentiment

Analysis of the sentiment surrounding HB 0351 shows a general inclination towards enhancing rehabilitation efforts for inmates while maintaining public safety. Proponents argue for the fiscal responsibility that the bill enforces, emphasizing it promotes a more structured approach to managing inmate employment. However, some critics may see this as an oversight of the underlying complexities involved in inmate reintegration and the potential financial burden it places on local businesses, which may need to absorb unexpected costs associated with monitoring. The sentiment tends to be supportive among legislators focusing on prison reform and efficiency in government operations.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the balancing act between ensuring accountability in work release programs through monitoring and the financial implications for local businesses and counties. Questions arise about the fairness of requiring organizations to cover monitoring costs for unpaid work, which could deter them from participating in rehabilitation initiatives. Furthermore, the bill does not address broader implications for inmates with limited wages, potentially leading to justice system disparities if not carefully implemented.