Tennessee House Bill HB0613

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/30/25
• Refer: 2/5/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 69, relative to mitigation.

Impact

The amendments proposed in HB0613 are expected to improve the management of water resources in Tennessee by establishing a formal process for annual reporting on permit applications. This means that applicants will have to disclose the details regarding the compensatory mitigation measures they employ, which could foster greater accountability and oversight. The involvement of the United States Army Corps of Engineers in collaboration with state agencies is also noteworthy, as it indicates a move towards a more unified approach in managing and mitigating environmental impacts due to development activities.

Summary

House Bill 0613 aims to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 69, focusing on mitigation-related provisions. The bill requires the Division of Water Resources to provide annual reports detailing permit applications and mechanisms of compensatory mitigation utilized within the preceding year. This legislative move is designed to enhance transparency in the mitigation process, particularly with respect to how mitigation banking or in-lieu fees are managed and reported. The implications of this bill are significant for developers and entities involved in water resource management, as they will need to adapt to the new reporting requirements mandated by this bill.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB0613 appears to lean towards positive views among environmental advocates and regulatory bodies, as it is perceived to promote better oversight and transparency. However, some industry stakeholders might express concerns over the additional administrative burden and compliance requirements introduced by the bill. There is a consensus among proponents that the enhanced reporting will help protect state water resources, yet there are worries about the feasibility of implementation for permit applicants.

Contention

Notable contention exists primarily around the aspects of increased reporting requirements and potential bureaucratic hurdles that could arise from them. Industry representatives have voiced apprehensions that the additional obligations could slow down the permit approval process, thereby impacting project timelines. On the other hand, advocates for environmental accountability argue that these measures are essential for holding permittees accountable and ensuring that effective mitigation strategies are employed.