Tennessee House Bill HB0863

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/4/25
• Refer: 3/10/25
• Refer: 3/19/25
• Refer: 3/26/25
• Engrossed: 4/1/25
• Enrolled: 4/16/25
• Passed: 5/2/25
• Chaptered: 5/8/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 5; Title 6; Title 7; Title 8; Title 9; Title 10; Title 13 and Title 67, relative to local government.

Impact

The legislation will have significant implications on how local governments administer their regulations and policies. By introducing a time limit on certain regulatory measures, it is anticipated that local governments will be better equipped to adjust their planning and zoning regulations as community needs evolve. This change may foster a more dynamic approach to local governance, allowing for regular review and updates on regulations that reflect changing circumstances in urban and community planning.

Summary

House Bill 0863 seeks to amend various sections of the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically those related to local government. The primary modification involves the language surrounding certain regulatory provisions, changing 'in perpetuity' to 'for at least thirty (30) years' in specific contexts. This change is aimed at providing clearer terms for local governments regarding their authority and obligations in regulating land use and planning. By ensuring a minimum duration for such regulations, the bill aims to promote stability and clarity in local governance practices.

Sentiment

The sentiments surrounding HB 0863 appear to be cautiously supportive among legislators who focus on local government autonomy and effectiveness. Proponents argue that the bill facilitates a more responsive local governance structure, while also providing necessary guidelines for the length of regulatory measures. However, there remains a concern among some stakeholders that this shift could lead to inconsistencies or reduced protections if local governments face pressures to change regulations more frequently.

Contention

Notably, some points of contention arise around the potential trade-offs between regulatory stability and flexibility for local governance. Critics fear that setting time limits on regulations could result in shorter-term decision-making that may not adequately address longer-term urban planning or environmental concerns. Therefore, the implications of HB 0863 suggest a balancing act between local control and the need for adaptable governance, which will be closely monitored during the implementation of this bill.