AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 3 and Title 4, relative to days of special observance.
Impact
The enactment of SB0578 would establish a formal recognition of Hazel Moore Day across the state, which could involve various festivities and community events aimed at promoting awareness about the significance of this observance. It will add to the calendar of special observance days in Tennessee and may foster a sense of community and pride among residents aware of Hazel Moore's legacy. This designation indicates the state's support and acknowledgment of contributions made by individuals who have impacted the community positively.
Summary
Senate Bill 578, introduced by Senator Akbari, proposes to designate December 14 of each year as 'Hazel Moore Day' in the state of Tennessee. The bill aims to amend the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically Title 4, Chapter 1, Part 4, to reflect this special observance. The significance of this day is tied to honoring the contributions or memory of an individual or cause represented by Hazel Moore, although the specific reasons for this designation are not detailed within the bill itself.
Sentiment
The sentiment surrounding the bill appears to be supportive, especially among those who advocate for the recognition of notable individuals in the community. By passing this bill, legislators send a message valuing local histories and contributions. While significant opposition or contention hasn't been noted in the discussions surrounding the bill, such observances generally garner a positive response from constituents who appreciate initiatives that honor community figures.
Contention
As a bill focused on setting a specific day of observance, SB0578 lacks the typical points of contention associated with legislation that impacts regulations or funding. However, a potential area for future debate could involve discussions on the criteria for such recognitions and whether sufficient public support exists for Hazel Moore Day. The bill serves mainly as an acknowledgment rather than a regulatory change, indicating a general trend towards valuing local heritage in state legislation.