Tennessee Senate Bill SB1166

Tennessee 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/6/25
• Engrossed: 4/15/25
• Enrolled: 4/17/25
• Passed: 5/2/25
• Chaptered: 5/13/25

Caption

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 6; Title 7; Title 8 and Title 38, relative to arrests made for operating vehicles under the influence.

Impact

The introduction of SB1166 signifies a notable shift in the state's approach to DUI arrests. By requiring comprehensive data on arrests without detected intoxicants, the bill seeks to enhance transparency about how DUI laws are enforced. This amendment aims to identify potential misuse of DUI laws by law enforcement agencies and could lead to reforms in policies related to DUI enforcement, providing a more nuanced understanding of such arrests and possibly preventing wrongful arrests in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 1166 is an act aimed at amending several titles in the Tennessee Code Annotated, specifically focusing on arrests made for operating vehicles under the influence (DUI). The bill mandates the Tennessee Bureau of Investigation to furnish an annual report detailing instances of DUI arrests where no alcohol or intoxicants are detected in the individual’s blood or breath. This report is required to be submitted to the legislative speakers on an annual basis starting January 1, 2026.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1166 appears to be generally supportive among lawmakers. Its passage was unanimous with a 32-0 vote, which suggests bipartisan backing. This level of agreement indicates that legislators recognize the importance of addressing potential oversights in DUI enforcement and are willing to hold law enforcement accountable through better data collection and reporting mechanisms.

Contention

Despite the broad support for SB1166, points of contention may arise regarding the implications of requiring law enforcement agencies to provide such reports. While proponents argue that the data will support public safety initiatives and fairness in enforcement, critics could contend that the requirement may unnecessarily burden law enforcement resources. Moreover, discussions around the potential impacts on public perception of DUI enforcement might surface, as some could view this increased scrutiny as a challenge to the legitimacy of certain DUI arrests.