Texas 2009 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1152 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD    Austin, Texas      FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION            April 24, 2009      TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1152 by Thompson ( Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted    No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.  The bill would permit a defendant in a capital case to request that the judge hold a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the defendant was a person with mental retardation at the time of the alleged offense.  The bill would prohibit a person who is found to have been mentally retarded at the time of the offense (and who is convicted) from being punished with death.  Such a defendant would be sentenced to life in prison without parole.  To the extent the bill would amend court procedures in capital cases; no significant affect on judicial workloads or offender populations is anticipated.  Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2009. Local Government Impact No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.    Source Agencies:212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice   LBB Staff:  JOB, TB, ESi, ZS, GG    

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 81ST LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 24, 2009





  TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence      FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board     IN RE:HB1152 by Thompson ( Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted  

TO: Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1152 by Thompson ( Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 Honorable Pete Gallego, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence 

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

 John S. O'Brien, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB1152 by Thompson ( Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB1152 by Thompson ( Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.



The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.  The bill would permit a defendant in a capital case to request that the judge hold a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the defendant was a person with mental retardation at the time of the alleged offense.  The bill would prohibit a person who is found to have been mentally retarded at the time of the offense (and who is convicted) from being punished with death.  Such a defendant would be sentenced to life in prison without parole.  To the extent the bill would amend court procedures in capital cases; no significant affect on judicial workloads or offender populations is anticipated.  Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2009.

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure as it relates to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.  The bill would permit a defendant in a capital case to request that the judge hold a pre-trial hearing to determine whether the defendant was a person with mental retardation at the time of the alleged offense.  The bill would prohibit a person who is found to have been mentally retarded at the time of the offense (and who is convicted) from being punished with death.  Such a defendant would be sentenced to life in prison without parole. 

To the extent the bill would amend court procedures in capital cases; no significant affect on judicial workloads or offender populations is anticipated.  Accordingly, no significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  The bill would take effect September 1, 2009.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

LBB Staff: JOB, TB, ESi, ZS, GG

 JOB, TB, ESi, ZS, GG