Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1152

Filed
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.

Impact

The enactment of HB 1152 will significantly alter the legal landscape regarding capital punishment in Texas, specifically concerning individuals with mental retardation. The new provisions require that a defendant's mental capacity be determined prior to sentencing, thereby creating a judicial framework for evaluating whether a defendant meets the criteria for mental retardation. Should a jury or judge find a defendant to be mentally retarded, the prevailing sentence would be life imprisonment without the possibility of parole instead of death, effectively removing death as a sentencing option.

Summary

House Bill 1152 addresses the application of the death penalty in cases where the defendant is determined to have mental retardation at the time of committing a capital offense. The bill establishes a new chapter, Chapter 46D, in the Code of Criminal Procedure that defines mental retardation and outlines how it affects the sentencing of defendants convicted of capital offenses. It explicitly states that individuals classified as mentally retarded may not be sentenced to death, seeking to align sentencing practices with the understanding of mental capacity under Texas law.

Contention

Notably, the bill has sparked debate regarding its implications for the legal standards around mental health and death sentences. Proponents argue that it is a humane approach that recognizes the limitations of individuals with mental retardation and prevents the state from imposing the ultimate penalty on those who may not fully grasp the consequences of their actions. Critics, on the other hand, may express concerns about defining mental retardation and ensuring that those who are culpable are not unfairly exempted from appropriate penalties. Additionally, the burden of proof for establishing mental retardation lies with the defendant, which raises questions about fairness in legal representation and advocacy for individuals in capital cases.

Companion Bills

TX SB167

Identical Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with mental retardation.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.