Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1152 Latest Draft

Bill / House Committee Report Version Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            By: Thompson, Dutton, Moody, et al. H.B. No. 1152
 Substitute the following for H.B. No. 1152:
 By: Miklos C.S.H.B. No. 1152


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital
 offense committed by a person with mental retardation.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1. Title I, Code of Criminal Procedure, is amended
 by adding Chapter 46D to read as follows:
 CHAPTER 46D. CAPITAL CASE: EFFECT OF MENTAL RETARDATION
 Art. 46D.01.  DEFINITION. In this chapter, "mental
 retardation" has the meaning assigned by Section 591.003, Health
 and Safety Code.
 Art. 46D.02.  RESTRICTION ON DEATH PENALTY.  Notwithstanding
 Section 19.03, Penal Code, a defendant convicted of a capital
 offense who is determined under this chapter to be a person with
 mental retardation may not be sentenced to death.
 Art. 46D.03.  INTENT TO RAISE MENTAL RETARDATION AS ISSUE.
 (a) A defendant in a capital case may request:
 (1)  that the judge hearing the case hold a pre-trial
 hearing to determine whether the defendant is a person with mental
 retardation; and
 (2)  the submission of a special issue to the jury under
 Section 2(e)(2), Article 37.071.
 (b)  The defendant must file a notice of intent to request a
 pretrial hearing under Section 2(e)(2), Article 37.071 with the
 court and the attorney representing the state not later than the
 60th day before the date the trial commences.
 Art. 46D.04.  PRETRIAL HEARING. A judge shall hold a
 pretrial hearing. After presentation of the evidence, a judge shall
 make a determination that the defendant is a person with mental
 retardation or is not a person with mental retardation.
 Art. 46D.05.  BURDEN OF PROOF. At a hearing under this
 chapter, the burden is on the defendant to prove by a preponderance
 of the evidence that the defendant is a person with mental
 retardation.
 Art. 46D.06.  SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES. (a) If the judge
 determines that the defendant was a person with mental retardation
 and the defendant is subsequently convicted of the offense, the
 judge may sentence the defendant to imprisonment in the Texas
 Department of Criminal Justice for life without parole.
 (b)  If the judge determines that the defendant was not a
 person with mental retardation, the judge shall conduct the trial
 in the same manner as if a hearing under this chapter had not been
 held. At the trial of the offense:
 (1)  the jury may not be informed of the fact that the
 judge has determined under this article that the defendant was not
 a person with mental retardation; and
 (2)  the defendant may present at trial evidence of
 mental disability as permitted by Article 37.071.
 (c)  The judge must make the determination of mental
 retardation before the trial of the offense commences under Section
 19.03, Penal Code.
 Art. 46D.07.  APPOINTMENT OF DISINTERESTED EXPERTS. On the
 request of either party or on the judge's own motion, the judge
 shall appoint two disinterested experts experienced and qualified
 in the field of diagnosing mental retardation to independently
 examine the defendant and determine whether the defendant is a
 person with mental retardation. The judge may order the defendant
 to submit to an examination by experts appointed under this
 article.
 Art. 46D.08.  CONSTRUCTION WITH OTHER LAW.  If the judge
 determines that the defendant was not a person with mental
 retardation and the defendant is subsequently convicted of the
 offense, the fact finder's determination:
 (1)  does not preclude the defendant from filing a
 motion under Article 46.05; and
 (2)  notwithstanding Article 46.05(j), is not
 admissible as evidence in a hearing under Article 46.05.
 Art. 46D.09.  SENTENCING PHASE SPECIAL ISSUE FOR JURY. (a)
 The court shall allow the jury to consider the evidence whether the
 defendant is a person with mental retardation offered by the
 attorney representing the state or the defendant.
 (b)(1)  If after considering all findings offered under
 Subsection (a) the jury finds by a preponderance of the evidence
 that the defendant is a person with mental retardation, the court
 may sentence the defendant to imprisonment as provided by Section
 2(j), Article 37.071.
 (2)  If the jury does not find that the defendant is a
 person with mental retardation, the court may sentence the
 defendant to death as provided by Section 2(g), Article 37.071.
 Art. 46D.10.  APPEAL. Upon conviction and sentencing, the
 defendant and the state are entitled to appeal a finding of a court
 described in this Article.
 SECTION 2. Section 2(a)(1), Article 37.071, Code of
 Criminal Procedure, is amended to read as follows:
 (a)(1) If a defendant is tried for a capital offense in
 which the state seeks the death penalty, on a finding that the
 defendant is guilty of a capital offense, the court shall conduct a
 separate sentencing proceeding to determine whether the defendant
 shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment without parole.
 The proceeding shall be conducted in the trial court and, except as
 provided by Article 44.29(c) of this code, before the trial jury as
 soon as practicable. In the proceeding, evidence may be presented
 by the state and the defendant or the defendant's counsel as to any
 matter that the court deems relevant to sentence, including
 evidence of the defendant's background or character or the
 circumstances of the offense that mitigates against the imposition
 of the death penalty, including evidence as to whether the
 defendant is a person with mental retardation. This subdivision
 shall not be construed to authorize the introduction of any
 evidence secured in violation of the Constitution of the United
 States or of the State of Texas. The state and the defendant or the
 defendant's counsel shall be permitted to present argument for or
 against sentence of death. The introduction of evidence of
 extraneous conduct is governed by the notice requirements of
 Section 3(g), Article 37.07. The court, the attorney representing
 the state, the defendant, or the defendant's counsel may not inform
 a juror or a prospective juror of the effect of a failure of a jury
 to agree on issues submitted under Subsection (c) or (e).
 SECTION 3. Chapter 6, Penal Code, is amended by adding
 Section 6.05 to read as follows:
 Sec. 6.05.  MENTAL RETARDATION AFFECTING DEATH SENTENCE.
 (a)  In this section, "mental retardation" has the meaning assigned
 by Section 591.003, Health and Safety Code.
 (b)  A person with mental retardation may not be punished by
 death.
 SECTION 4. The change in law made by this Act applies only
 to a capital case that commences on or after the effective date of
 this Act. A capital case that commences before the effective date of
 this Act is covered by the law in effect when the case commenced,
 and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.
 SECTION 5. This Act takes effect September 1, 2009.