Texas House Bill HB1303

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/15/09

Caption

Relating to continued health insurance coverage for eligible survivors of certain public servants killed in the line of duty.

Notes

Furthermore, the bill stipulates that any surviving beneficiaries who choose to reapply for health benefits will do so under the same conditions that would have applied had they continued coverage following the death of their loved one. The timeframe for these provisions is temporary, set to expire on September 1, 2010, prompting potential future discussions on the longevity and effectiveness of such survivor benefits.

Impact

The legislation specifically impacts the way health insurance coverage is managed for survivors, allowing them to make premium payments comparable to those of current employees. Additionally, it ensures that survivors may not be required to pay higher premiums than current eligible employees. This structure is intended to promote financial stability for families of public servants lost in the line of duty, thereby reinforcing the state's commitment to support these families during challenging times.

Summary

House Bill 1303 addresses the provision of continued health insurance coverage for eligible survivors of public servants who have been killed in the line of duty. The bill amends existing sections of the Government Code to ensure that these survivors can purchase health insurance at the same group rate as active employees of the same employing entity. This change aims to ease the financial burden on the survivors who are navigating the aftermath of losing a loved one in service to the public.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 1303 is the provision that allows certain eligible survivors who did not initially opt for continued coverage to reapply under specific conditions within a limited time frame. This aspect of the bill may generate discussions regarding the adequacy of the time allotted for such reapplications and the implications it holds for survivors who may miss this window. Proponents believe that these provisions are critical for providing ongoing support, whereas critics may raise concerns about the effectiveness of communication around these opportunities.