Texas House Bill HB1535

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Caption

Relating to the requirement that gas corporations obtain a permit from the Railroad Commission of Texas before condemning property to construct certain gas pipelines.

Impact

The bill proposes significant changes to the regulatory framework surrounding gas pipeline construction. It requires gas corporations to not only outline proposed routes but also to present alternative routes and conduct studies on using existing public rights-of-way. Additionally, it introduces a timeline where the Railroad Commission must act upon permit applications within one year. If the Commission does not comply, applicants may seek judicial intervention. This is intended to prevent indefinite delays in project approvals, thereby providing more certainty for gas corporations while attempting to ensure that the impacts on local communities are adequately considered.

Summary

House Bill 1535 intends to amend the Utilities Code regarding the requirement for gas corporations to obtain a permit from the Railroad Commission of Texas when condemning property for gas pipeline construction. It establishes specific regulations detailing how gas corporations must navigate permitting for the construction of new pipelines, emphasizing the necessity of public safety and community considerations. The bill defines the process for applying for permits, factors to be considered by the Commission, and establishes the rights of affected property owners, aiming to balance the interests of gas corporations and local communities.

Contention

Notably, there could be contention surrounding this bill, particularly concerning landowner rights and the regulatory power of the Railroad Commission. While proponents may argue that the bill brings much-needed oversight and structure to pipeline construction, opponents may view it as facilitating undue hardship on property owners who might be adversely affected by condemnation actions. The requirement for public hearings offers a platform for landowners and community members to express concerns, but the necessity of balancing economic interests against property rights will likely lead to substantial debate during discussions surrounding the bill.