Texas House Bill HB1600

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 3/25/09
• Voted on by House: 5/12/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/22/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/27/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/29/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to the creation of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 201; providing authority to impose a tax and issue bonds; granting a limited power of eminent domain.

Impact

One of the significant aspects of HB1600 is its authority for the district to impose taxes and issue bonds to finance its operations and projects. The bill delineates the processes for holding elections to obtain voter authorization for imposing ad valorem taxes or for the issuance of bonds secured by such taxes. Importantly, it grants the district limited powers of eminent domain, allowing it to acquire property necessary for its operations, although this power is constrained to within district boundaries. This aspect of the bill ensures that while the district can pursue essential developments, there are checks on its ability to affect private land holdings beyond its jurisdiction.

Summary

House Bill 1600 pertains to the creation of the Fort Bend County Municipal Utility District No. 201. The bill establishes the district with a defined geographical area, allowing it to provide utility services in accordance with state laws governing municipal utility districts. The new district is structured to achieve specific public purposes and benefits, particularly in the development of utility infrastructure and public improvements, such as roads and storm drainage systems. The provisions set forth in the bill emphasize the district's authority to operate and manage various services critical to the communities within its boundaries.

Contention

While the bill aims to streamline the establishment of essential utility services in Fort Bend County, it may potentially raise concerns among residents regarding taxation and local governance. The creation of this municipal utility district could lead to increased taxes on local property owners to fund operations and projects, which has caused debate among community stakeholders. Furthermore, the ability to exercise eminent domain may lead to apprehension regarding property rights and local autonomy, particularly in areas where residents may feel their interests are not adequately represented in the decision-making processes of the district's governance.