Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB1607

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to compensation and employment benefits for members of the Texas State Guard called to state active duty.

Note

The legislative process for HB1607 indicated that it was referred to the Defense & Veterans' Affairs committee as of March 2, 2009, where further discussions and potential amendments could take place before any voting occurs.

Impact

The proposed legislation has significant implications for the state’s personnel policies related to the Texas State Guard. Members called to active duty will be classified as state employees, meaning they are entitled to receive pay as established for state workers, in accordance with Chapters 654 and 659 of the Texas Government Code. In addition to standard compensation, the bill also allows for higher pay rates if a member's active duty exceeds 45 consecutive days, ensuring that their financial needs are met during extended service periods.

Summary

House Bill 1607 addresses the compensation and employment benefits for members of the Texas State Guard when they are called to state active duty. The bill amends existing regulations to clarify the payments and reimbursements available to these service members, ensuring that they receive appropriate compensation consistent with their duties. It specifically highlights circumstances under which these members can receive pay, allowances, and reimbursements for lodging and meals while serving under state authority.

Contention

While the bill is mainly focused on providing fair compensation for service members, it may also spur discussions around fiscal responsibilities and the allocation of state resources. Some stakeholders could raise concerns over the increased budgetary impact associated with possible salary adjustments for members who serve extended active duty. The bill's immediate effect hinges on securing a two-thirds majority vote from both legislative houses, indicating potential divisions among lawmakers regarding the provisions and their financial implications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.