Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB2880 Latest Draft

Bill / Introduced Version Filed 02/01/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                            81R2085 CAE-D
 By: Martinez H.B. No. 2880


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to assessment instruments administered to public school
 students in grades three through eight.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1. Section 21.4551(c), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (c) The commissioner by rule shall require a teacher to
 attend a reading academy if the teacher provides instruction in
 reading, mathematics, science, or social studies to students at the
 sixth, seventh, or eighth grade level at a campus that is considered
 academically unacceptable under Section 39.132 on the basis of
 student performance on the reading benchmark assessment instrument
 administered under Section 39.0237(a) [39.023(a)] to students in
 any grade level at the campus.
 SECTION 2. Sections 28.0211(a), (b), (c), (d), (e), (f),
 (g), (i), (k), and (m), Education Code, are amended to read as
 follows:
 (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b) or (e), a student
 may not be promoted to:
 (1) the fourth grade program to which the student
 would otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform
 satisfactorily on the third grade reading benchmark assessment
 instruments [instrument] under Section 39.0237 or show annual
 improvement in student achievement [39.023];
 (2) the sixth grade program to which the student would
 otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform
 satisfactorily on the fifth grade mathematics and reading benchmark
 assessment instruments under Section 39.0237 or show annual
 improvement in student achievement [39.023]; or
 (3) the ninth grade program to which the student would
 otherwise be assigned if the student does not perform
 satisfactorily on the eighth grade mathematics and reading
 benchmark assessment instruments under Section 39.0237 or show
 annual improvement in student achievement [39.023].
 (b) [A school district shall provide to a student who
 initially fails to perform satisfactorily on an assessment
 instrument specified under Subsection (a) at least two additional
 opportunities to take the assessment instrument.] A school
 district may administer [an] alternate assessment instruments
 [instrument] to a student who has failed a benchmark [an]
 assessment instrument specified under Subsection (a) on [the
 previous] two occasions [opportunities]. Notwithstanding any
 other provision of this section, a student may be promoted if the
 student performs at grade level on [an] alternate assessment
 instruments [instrument] under this subsection that are [is]
 appropriate for the student's grade level and approved by the
 commissioner.
 (c) Each time a student fails to perform satisfactorily on a
 benchmark [an] assessment instrument specified under Subsection
 (a), the school district in which the student attends school shall
 provide to the student accelerated instruction in the applicable
 subject area, including reading instruction for a student who fails
 to perform satisfactorily on a reading benchmark assessment
 instrument. After a student fails to perform satisfactorily on a
 benchmark [an] assessment instrument a second time, a grade
 placement committee shall be established to prescribe the
 accelerated instruction the district shall provide to the student
 before the student is administered the benchmark assessment
 instrument the third time. The grade placement committee shall be
 composed of the principal or the principal's designee, the
 student's parent or guardian, and the teacher of the subject of a
 benchmark [an] assessment instrument on which the student failed to
 perform satisfactorily. The district shall notify the parent or
 guardian of the time and place for convening the grade placement
 committee and the purpose of the committee. An accelerated
 instruction group administered by a school district under this
 section may not have a ratio of more than 10 students for each
 teacher.
 (d) In addition to providing accelerated instruction to a
 student under Subsection (c), the district shall notify the
 student's parent or guardian of:
 (1) the student's failure to perform satisfactorily on
 a benchmark [the] assessment instrument;
 (2) the accelerated instruction program to which the
 student is assigned; and
 (3) the possibility that the student might be retained
 at the same grade level for the next school year.
 (e) A student who does not[, after at least three attempts,
 fails to] perform satisfactorily on each benchmark [an] assessment
 instrument in each subject specified under Subsection (a) may
 [shall] be retained at the same grade level for the next school year
 in accordance with Subsection (a) if the student has not shown
 annual improvement or progress. The student's parent or guardian
 may appeal the student's retention by submitting a request to the
 grade placement committee established under Subsection (c). The
 school district shall give the parent or guardian written notice of
 the opportunity to appeal. The grade placement committee may
 decide in favor of a student's promotion only if the committee
 concludes, using standards adopted by the board of trustees, that
 if promoted and given accelerated instruction, the student is
 likely to perform at grade level. A student may not be promoted on
 the basis of the grade placement committee's decision unless that
 decision is unanimous. The commissioner by rule shall establish a
 time line for making the placement determination. This subsection
 does not create a property interest in promotion. The decision of
 the grade placement committee is final and may not be appealed.
 (f) A school district shall provide to a student who[, after
 three attempts,] has failed to perform satisfactorily on at least
 two benchmark [an] assessment instruments in a subject [instrument]
 specified under Subsection (a) accelerated instruction in that
 subject during the next school year as prescribed by an educational
 plan developed for the student by the student's grade placement
 committee established under Subsection (c). The district shall
 provide that accelerated instruction regardless of whether the
 student has been promoted or retained. The educational plan must be
 designed to enable the student to perform at the appropriate grade
 level by the conclusion of the school year. During the school year,
 the student shall be monitored to ensure that the student is
 progressing in accordance with the plan. [The district shall
 administer to the student the assessment instrument for the grade
 level in which the student is placed at the time the district
 regularly administers the assessment instruments for that school
 year.]
 (g) This section does not preclude the retention at a grade
 level, in accordance with state law or school district policy, of a
 student who performs satisfactorily on benchmark [an] assessment
 instruments [instrument] specified under Subsection (a).
 (i) The admission, review, and dismissal committee of a
 student who participates in a district's special education program
 under Subchapter B, Chapter 29, and who does not perform
 satisfactorily on benchmark [an] assessment instruments
 [instrument] specified under Subsection (a) and administered under
 Section 39.0237(a) or (b) [39.023(a) or (b)] shall determine:
 (1) the manner in which the student will participate
 in an accelerated instruction program under this section; and
 (2) whether the student will be promoted or retained
 under this section.
 (k) The commissioner shall adopt rules as necessary to
 implement this section, including rules concerning when school
 districts shall administer benchmark assessment instruments
 required under this section and which administration of the
 benchmark assessment instruments will be used for purposes of
 Section 39.051.
 (m) The commissioner shall certify, not later than July 1 of
 each school year or as soon as practicable thereafter, whether
 sufficient funds have been appropriated statewide for the purposes
 of this section. A determination by the commissioner is final and
 may not be appealed. For purposes of certification, the
 commissioner may not consider Foundation School Program
 funds. This section may be implemented only if the commissioner
 certifies that sufficient funds have been appropriated during a
 school year for administering the benchmark [accelerated]
 instruction programs specified under this section, including
 teacher training for that purpose.
 SECTION 3. Section 28.0213(e), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (e) For a student in a special education program under
 Subchapter A, Chapter 29, who does not perform satisfactorily on an
 assessment instrument administered under Section 39.023(a), (b),
 or (c) or benchmark assessment instruments administered under
 Section 39.0237, the student's admission, review, and dismissal
 committee shall design the program to:
 (1) enable the student to attain a standard of annual
 growth on the basis of the student's individualized education
 program; and
 (2) if applicable, carry out the purposes of Section
 28.0211.
 SECTION 4. Section 29.056(g), Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 (g) A district may transfer a student of limited English
 proficiency out of a bilingual education or special language
 program for the first time or a subsequent time if the student is
 able to participate equally in a regular all-English instructional
 program as determined by:
 (1) agency-approved tests administered at the end of
 each school year to determine the extent to which the student has
 developed oral and written language proficiency and specific
 language skills in English;
 (2) satisfactory performance on the reading
 assessment instrument under Section 39.023(a), the reading
 benchmark assessment instruments under Section 39.0237, or an
 English language arts assessment instrument under Section
 39.023(c), as applicable, with the assessment instrument
 administered in English, or, if the student is enrolled in the first
 or second grade, an achievement score at or above the 40th
 percentile in the reading and language arts sections of an English
 standardized test approved by the agency; and
 (3) agency-approved criterion-referenced tests and
 the results of a subjective teacher evaluation.
 SECTION 5. Section 29.0561(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b) During the first two school years after a student is
 transferred out of a bilingual education or special language
 program under Section 29.056(g), the language proficiency
 assessment committee shall review the student's performance and
 consider:
 (1) the total amount of time the student was enrolled
 in a bilingual education or special language program;
 (2) the student's grades each grading period in each
 subject in the foundation curriculum under Section 28.002(a)(1);
 (3) the student's performance on each assessment
 instrument administered under Section 39.023(a) or (c) or benchmark
 assessment instruments administered under Section 39.0237(a);
 (4) the number of credits the student has earned
 toward high school graduation, if applicable; and
 (5) any disciplinary actions taken against the student
 under Subchapter A, Chapter 37.
 SECTION 6. Section 30A.110(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b) Each student enrolled under this chapter in an
 electronic course offered through the state virtual school network
 must take any assessment instrument under Section 39.023 and any
 benchmark assessment instruments under Section 39.0237 that are
 [is] administered to students who are provided instruction in the
 course material in the traditional classroom setting. The
 administration of the assessment instrument or benchmark
 assessment instruments to the student enrolled in the electronic
 course must be supervised by a proctor.
 SECTION 7. Section 37.008(m), Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 (m) The commissioner shall adopt rules necessary to
 evaluate annually the performance of each district's disciplinary
 alternative education program established under this subchapter.
 The evaluation required by this section shall be based on
 indicators defined by the commissioner, but must include student
 performance on assessment instruments required under Sections
 39.023(a) and (c) and benchmark assessment instruments required
 under Section 39.0237(a). Academically, the mission of
 disciplinary alternative education programs shall be to enable
 students to perform at grade level.
 SECTION 8. Sections 39.023(a), (b), (c-3), (h), and (i),
 Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a) The agency shall adopt or develop appropriate
 criterion-referenced assessment instruments designed to assess a
 student's essential knowledge and skills in reading, writing,
 mathematics, social studies, and science. The assessment
 instrument administered under this subsection is a diagnostic
 examination administered during the first six weeks of the school
 year and may be used by the district only to identify the academic
 strengths and weaknesses of each student. All students, except
 students assessed under Subsection (b) or (l) or exempted under
 Section 39.027, shall be assessed in:
 (1) mathematics, annually in grades three through
 seven without the aid of technology and in grade eight with the aid
 of technology on any assessment instrument that includes algebra;
 (2) reading, annually in grades three through eight;
 (3) writing, including spelling and grammar, in grades
 four and seven;
 (4) social studies, in grade eight;
 (5) science, in grades five and eight; and
 (6) any other subject and grade required by federal
 law.
 (b) The agency shall develop or adopt appropriate
 criterion-referenced assessment instruments to be administered to
 each student in a special education program under Subchapter A,
 Chapter 29, who receives modified instruction in the essential
 knowledge and skills identified under Section 28.002 for the
 assessed subject but for whom an assessment instrument adopted
 under Subsection (a), even with allowable modifications, would not
 provide an appropriate measure of student achievement, as
 determined by the student's admission, review, and dismissal
 committee. The assessment instrument administered under this
 subsection is a diagnostic examination administered during the
 first six weeks of the school year and may be used by the district
 only to identify the academic strengths and weaknesses of each
 student. The assessment instruments required under this subsection
 must assess essential knowledge and skills and growth in the
 subjects of reading, mathematics, and writing. A student's
 admission, review, and dismissal committee shall determine whether
 any allowable modification is necessary in administering to the
 student an assessment instrument required under this subsection.
 The assessment instruments required under this subsection shall be
 administered on the same schedule as the assessment instruments
 administered under Subsection (a).
 (c-3) In adopting a schedule for the administration of
 assessment instruments under this section, the State Board of
 Education shall require[:
 [(1)     assessment instruments administered under
 Subsection (a) to be administered on a schedule so that the first
 assessment instrument is administered at least two weeks later than
 the date on which the first assessment instrument was administered
 under Subsection (a) during the 2006-2007 school year; and
 [(2)] the spring administration of end-of-course
 assessment instruments under Subsection (c) to occur in each school
 district not earlier than the first full week in May, except that
 the spring administration of the end-of-course assessment
 instruments in English I, English II, and English III must be
 permitted to occur at an earlier date.
 (h) The agency shall notify school districts and campuses of
 the results of assessment instruments administered under this
 section at the earliest possible date determined by the State Board
 of Education [but not later than the beginning of the subsequent
 school year].
 (i) The provisions of this section, except Subsections (a),
 (b), and [Subsection] (d), are subject to modification by rules
 adopted under Section 39.022. Each assessment instrument adopted
 under those rules and each assessment instrument required under
 Subsection (d) must be reliable and valid and must meet any
 applicable federal requirements for measurement of student
 progress.
 SECTION 9. Subchapter B, Chapter 39, Education Code, is
 amended by adding Sections 39.0236 and 39.0237 to read as follows:
 Sec. 39.0236.  REGIONAL EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER BENCHMARK
 ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT COMMITTEE. (a) Each regional education
 service center shall appoint one person to serve on the benchmark
 assessment instrument committee. The committee shall adopt or
 develop appropriate benchmark assessment instruments designed to
 assess knowledge and skills in reading, writing, mathematics,
 social studies, and science in grades three through eight.
 (b)  School districts shall provide assistance to the
 committee as requested in developing and administering the
 benchmark assessment instruments.
 (c)  The committee shall review each benchmark assessment
 instrument every two years.
 (d)  The committee shall develop benchmark assessment
 instruments in a manner that allows for the measurement of annual
 improvement in student achievement as required by Sections
 39.034(c) and (d).
 (e)  The benchmark assessment instruments shall be designed
 to include assessment of a student's problem-solving ability and
 complex-thinking skills using a method of assessing those abilities
 and skills that is demonstrated to be highly reliable.
 (f)  The committee shall release the questions and answer
 keys to each benchmark assessment instrument administered under
 Subsection (a) not later than the second anniversary of the date the
 instrument is administered.
 Sec. 39.0237.  BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT. (a) Every
 six weeks, all students other than students assessed under
 Subsection (b) or (c) or exempted under Section 39.027 shall be
 administered the benchmark assessment instruments developed by the
 regional education service center benchmark assessment instrument
 committee in:
 (1)  mathematics, in grades three through seven without
 the aid of technology and in grade eight with the aid of technology
 on any benchmark assessment instrument that includes algebra;
 (2) reading, in grades three through eight;
 (3)  writing, including spelling and grammar, in grades
 four and seven;
 (4) social studies, in grade eight; and
 (5) science, in grades five and eight.
 (b)  The benchmark assessment instrument committee shall
 develop or adopt appropriate benchmark assessment instruments to be
 administered to each student in a special education program under
 Subchapter A, Chapter 29, who receives modified instruction in the
 essential knowledge and skills identified under Section 28.002 for
 the assessed subject but for whom a benchmark assessment instrument
 adopted under Section 39.0236(a), even with allowable
 modifications, would not provide an appropriate measure of student
 achievement, as determined by the student's admission, review, and
 dismissal committee. The benchmark assessment instruments
 required under this subsection must assess essential knowledge and
 skills and growth in the subjects of reading, mathematics, and
 writing. A student's admission, review, and dismissal committee
 shall determine whether any allowable modification is necessary in
 administering to the student a benchmark assessment instrument
 required under this subsection. The benchmark assessment
 instruments required under this subsection shall be administered on
 the same schedule as the benchmark assessment instruments
 administered under Subsection (a).
 (c)  The benchmark assessment instrument committee shall
 adopt rules for the administration of the benchmark assessment
 instruments adopted under Section 39.0236(a) in Spanish to students
 in grades three through eight who are of limited English
 proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052, whose primary language
 is Spanish. Each student of limited English proficiency whose
 primary language is Spanish, other than a student to whom
 Subsection (b) applies, may be assessed using benchmark assessment
 instruments in Spanish under this subsection for up to three years
 or benchmark instruments in English under Subsection (a). The
 language proficiency assessment committee established under
 Section 29.063 shall determine which students are administered
 benchmark assessment instruments in Spanish under this subsection.
 (d)  The commissioner by rule shall develop procedures under
 which the language proficiency assessment committee established
 under Section 29.063 shall determine which students are exempt from
 the administration of the benchmark assessment instruments under
 Sections 39.027(a)(6) and (7). The rules adopted under this
 subsection shall ensure that the language proficiency assessment
 committee provides that the exempted students are administered the
 benchmark assessment instruments under Subsection (a) at the
 earliest practical date.
 (e)  This subsection applies only to a student who is
 determined to have dyslexia or a related disorder and who is an
 individual with a disability under 29 U.S.C. Section 705(20). The
 benchmark assessment instrument committee shall adopt or develop
 appropriate benchmark assessment instruments designed to assess
 the ability of and to be administered to each student to whom this
 subsection applies for whom the benchmark assessment instruments
 adopted under Section 39.0236(a), even with allowable
 modifications, would not provide an appropriate measure of student
 achievement, as determined by the committee established by the
 board of trustees of the district to determine the placement of
 students with dyslexia or related disorders. The placement
 committee shall determine whether any allowable modification is
 necessary in administering to a student a benchmark assessment
 instrument required under this subsection. The benchmark
 assessment instruments required under this subsection shall be
 administered on the same schedule as the benchmark assessment
 instruments administered under Subsection (a).
 (f)  A student is considered to have met the standards for
 advancement if the student passes each benchmark assessment
 instrument or the student shows annual improvement in student
 achievement to meet the grade level requirements. A student must
 have attended school at least 150 days to meet the grade level
 requirements.
 SECTION 10. Section 39.026, Education Code, is amended to
 read as follows:
 Sec. 39.026. LOCAL OPTION. In addition to the assessment
 instruments adopted by the agency and administered by the State
 Board of Education and the benchmark assessment instruments
 administered under Section 39.0237, a school district may adopt and
 administer criterion-referenced or norm-referenced assessment
 instruments, or both, at any grade level. A norm-referenced
 assessment instrument adopted under this section must be
 economical, nationally recognized, and state-approved.
 SECTION 11. Section 39.0262(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a) In a subject area for which assessment instruments are
 administered under Section 39.023 or benchmark assessment
 instruments are administered under Section 39.0237, a school
 district may not administer district-required assessment
 instruments to any student on more than 10 percent of the
 instructional days in any school year.
 SECTION 12. Sections 39.027(a), (b), (c), (e), and (g),
 Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a) A student may be exempted from the administration of an
 assessment or benchmark assessment instrument under:
 (1) Section 39.023(a) or (b) if the student is
 eligible for a special education program under Section 29.003 and
 the student's individualized education program does not include
 instruction in the essential knowledge and skills under Section
 28.002 at any grade level;
 (2) Section 39.023(c) or (d) if the student is
 eligible for a special education program under Section 29.003 and:
 (A) the student's individualized education
 program does not include instruction in the essential knowledge and
 skills under Section 28.002 at any grade level; or
 (B) the assessment instrument, even with
 allowable modifications, would not provide an appropriate measure
 of the student's achievement as determined by the student's
 admission, review, and dismissal committee;
 (3) Section 39.023(a) or (l) for a period of up to one
 year after initial enrollment in a school in the United States if
 the student is of limited English proficiency, as defined by
 Section 29.052, and has not demonstrated proficiency in English as
 determined by the assessment system under Subsection (e); or
 (4) Section 39.023(a) or (l) for a period of up to two
 years in addition to the exemption period authorized by Subdivision
 (3) if the student has received an exemption under Subdivision (3)
 and:
 (A) is a recent unschooled immigrant; or
 (B) is in a grade for which no assessment
 instrument in the primary language of the student is available;
 (5)  Section 39.0237(a) or (b) if the student is
 eligible for a special education program under Section 29.003 and
 the student's individualized education program does not include
 instruction in the essential knowledge and skills under Section
 28.002 at any grade level; or
 (6)  Section 39.0237(a) or (c) for a period of up to one
 year after initial enrollment in a school in the United States if
 the student is of limited English proficiency, as defined by
 Section 29.052, and has not demonstrated proficiency in English as
 determined by the assessment system under Subsection (e); or
 (7)  Section 39.0237(a) or (c) for a period of up to two
 years in addition to the exemption period authorized by Subdivision
 (6) if the student has received an exemption under Subdivision (6)
 and:
 (A) is a recent unschooled immigrant; or
 (B)  is in a grade for which no benchmark
 assessment instruments in the primary language of the student are
 available.
 (b) The State Board of Education shall adopt rules under
 which a dyslexic student who is not exempt under Subsection (a) may
 use procedures including oral examinations if appropriate or may be
 allowed additional time or the materials or technology necessary
 for the student to demonstrate the student's mastery of the
 competencies the assessment instruments or benchmark assessment
 instruments are designed to measure.
 (c) The commissioner shall develop and adopt a process for
 reviewing the exemption process of a school district or shared
 services arrangement that gives an exemption under Subsection
 (a)(1) or (a)(5) as follows:
 (1) to more than five percent of the students in the
 special education program, in the case of a district or shared
 services arrangement with an average daily attendance of at least
 1,600;
 (2) to more than 10 percent of the students in the
 special education program, in the case of a district or shared
 services arrangement with an average daily attendance of at least
 190 and not more than 1,599; or
 (3) to the greater of more than 10 percent of the
 students in the special education program or to at least five
 students in the special education program, in the case of a district
 or shared services arrangement with an average daily attendance of
 not more than 189.
 (e) The commissioner shall develop an assessment system
 that shall be used for evaluating the academic progress, including
 reading proficiency in English, of all students of limited English
 proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052. A student who is exempt
 from the administration of an assessment instrument under
 Subsection (a)(3), [or] (4), (6), or (7) who achieves reading
 proficiency in English as determined by the assessment system
 developed under this subsection shall be administered the
 assessment instruments described by Sections 39.023(a) and (c) and
 benchmark assessment instruments described by Section 39.0237(a)
 or (c). The performance under the assessment system developed
 under this subsection of students to whom Subsection (a)(3), [or]
 (4), (6), or (7) applies shall be included in the academic
 excellence indicator system under Section 39.051, the performance
 report under Section 39.053, and the comprehensive annual report
 under Section 39.182. This information shall be provided in a
 manner that is disaggregated by the bilingual education or special
 language program, if any, in which the student is enrolled.
 (g) For purposes of this section, "recent unschooled
 immigrant" means an immigrant who initially enrolled in a school in
 the United States not more than 12 months before the date of the
 administration of an assessment instrument under Section 39.023(a)
 or (l) or a benchmark assessment instrument under Section
 39.0237(a) or (c) and who, as a result of inadequate schooling
 outside of the United States, lacks the necessary foundation in the
 essential knowledge and skills of the curriculum prescribed under
 Section 28.002 as determined by the language proficiency assessment
 committee established under Section 29.063. For purposes of this
 subsection and to the extent authorized by federal law, a child's
 prior enrollment in a school in the United States shall be
 determined on the basis of documents and records required under
 Section 25.002(a).
 SECTION 13. Sections 39.034(a), (c), (e), and (g),
 Education Code, are amended to read as follows:
 (a) The commissioner shall determine a method by which the
 agency may measure annual improvement in student achievement from
 one school year to the next on an assessment instrument required
 under this subchapter for students in grades nine and above and on
 benchmark assessment instruments for students in grades three
 through eight. A student in grades three through eight is
 considered to have made adequate annual improvement if the student
 shows annual improvement regardless of the student's performance on
 benchmark assessment instruments.
 (c) The agency shall use a student's previous years'
 performance data on an assessment instrument or benchmark
 assessment instrument required under this subchapter to determine
 the student's expected annual improvement. The agency shall
 report that expected level of annual improvement and the actual
 level of annual improvement achieved to the district. The report
 must state whether the student fell below, met, or exceeded the
 agency's expectation for improvement.
 (e) The agency shall report to each school district the
 comparisons made under this section. Each school district shall
 provide the comparisons to each teacher for all students who were:
 (1) assessed on an assessment instrument or benchmark
 assessment instrument; and
 (2) taught by that teacher in the subject for which the
 assessment instrument or benchmark assessment instrument was
 administered.
 (g) To the extent practicable, the agency shall combine the
 report of the comparisons required under this section with the
 report of the student's performance on assessment instruments
 administered under Section 39.023 and benchmark assessment
 instruments administered under Section 39.0237.
 SECTION 14. Section 39.051, Education Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (b), (d), (f), and (g) and adding Subsection
 (b-2) to read as follows:
 (b) Performance on the indicators adopted under this
 section shall be compared to state-established standards. The
 degree of change from one school year to the next in performance on
 each indicator adopted under this section shall also be
 considered. The indicators must be based on information that is
 disaggregated by [race,] ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic
 status and must include:
 (1) the results of assessment instruments required
 under Section 39.023(c) [Sections 39.023(a), (c),] and benchmark
 assessment instruments required under Section 39.0237 [(l)],
 aggregated by grade level and subject area;
 (2) dropout rates, including dropout rates and
 district completion rates for grade levels 9 through 12, computed
 in accordance with standards and definitions adopted by the
 National Center for Education Statistics of the United States
 Department of Education;
 (3) high school graduation rates, computed in
 accordance with standards and definitions adopted in compliance
 with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (Pub. L. No. 107-110);
 (4) student attendance rates;
 (5) the percentage of graduating students who attain
 scores on the questions developed for end-of-course assessment
 instruments under Section 39.0233(a) that are equivalent to a
 passing score on the assessment instrument required under Section
 51.3062;
 (6) the percentage of graduating students who meet the
 course requirements established for the recommended high school
 program by State Board of Education rule;
 (7) the results of the Scholastic Assessment Test
 (SAT), the American College Test (ACT), articulated postsecondary
 degree programs described by Section 61.852, and certified
 workforce training programs described by Chapter 311, Labor Code;
 (8) the percentage of students, aggregated by grade
 level, provided accelerated instruction under Section 28.0211(c),
 the results of benchmark assessment instruments [assessments]
 administered under that section, the percentage of students
 promoted through the grade placement committee process under
 Section 28.0211, the subject of the benchmark assessment instrument
 on which each student failed to perform satisfactorily, and the
 performance of those students in the school year following that
 promotion on the assessment instruments required under Section
 39.023 and benchmark assessment instruments required under Section
 39.0237;
 (9) for students who have failed to perform
 satisfactorily on benchmark [an] assessment instruments
 [instrument] required under Section 39.0237(a) or an assessment
 instrument required under Section 39.023(c) [39.023(a) or (c)], the
 numerical progress of those students grouped by percentage on
 subsequent assessment instruments required under those sections,
 aggregated by grade level and subject area;
 (10) the percentage of students exempted, by exemption
 category, from the assessment programs [program] generally
 applicable under this chapter;
 (11) the percentage of students of limited English
 proficiency exempted from the administration of an assessment
 instrument or benchmark assessment instrument under Sections
 39.027(a)(3), [and] (4), (6), and (7);
 (12) the percentage of students in a special education
 program under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, assessed through benchmark
 assessment instruments developed or adopted under Section
 39.0237(b) [39.023(b)];
 (13) the measure of progress toward preparation for
 postsecondary success; and
 (14) the measure of progress toward dual language
 proficiency under Section 39.034(b), for students of limited
 English proficiency, as defined by Section 29.052.
 (b-2)  Notwithstanding Subsection (b)(2), in determining
 dropout rates and district completion rates under that subsection
 for grade levels 9 through 12 for purposes of the state
 accountability system under this chapter, a student who has
 obtained a high school equivalency certificate (GED) or completed
 four years of high school is considered to have completed school and
 is not considered to have dropped out of school.
 (d) Annually, the commissioner shall define exemplary,
 recognized, and unacceptable performance for each academic
 excellence indicator included under Subsections (b)(1) through (7)
 and shall project the standards for each of those levels of
 performance for succeeding years. For the indicator under
 Subsection (b)(8), the commissioner shall define exemplary,
 recognized, and unacceptable performance based on student
 performance for the period covering both the current and preceding
 academic years. In defining exemplary, recognized, and
 unacceptable performance for the indicators under Subsections
 (b)(2) and (4), the commissioner may not consider as a dropout or as
 a student who has failed to attend school a student:
 (1)  who has obtained a high school equivalency
 certificate (GED) or attended four years of high school; or
 (2) whose failure to attend school results from:
 (A) [(1)] the student's expulsion under Section
 37.007; and
 (B) [(2)] as applicable:
 (i) [(A)] adjudication as having engaged in
 delinquent conduct or conduct indicating a need for supervision, as
 defined by Section 51.03, Family Code; or
 (ii) [(B)] conviction of and sentencing for
 an offense under the Penal Code.
 (f) The indicator under Subsection (b)(1) must include the
 results of benchmark assessment instruments required under Section
 39.0237(b) [39.023(b)].
 (g) The commissioner by rule shall adopt accountability
 measures to be used in assessing the progress of students who have
 failed to perform satisfactorily in the preceding school year on
 benchmark [an] assessment instruments [instrument] required under
 Section 39.0237 [39.023(a), (c), or (l)].
 SECTION 15. Section 39.072(c), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (c) The agency shall evaluate against state standards and
 shall, not later than August 1 of each year, report the performance
 of each campus in a district and each open-enrollment charter
 school on the basis of the campus's performance on the indicators
 adopted under Sections 39.051(b)(1) through (8). Consideration of
 the effectiveness of district programs under Subsection (b)(2) or
 (3) must be based on data collected through the Public Education
 Information Management System for purposes of accountability under
 this chapter and include the results of assessment instruments
 [assessments] required under Section 39.023 or benchmark
 assessment instruments required under Section 39.0237.
 SECTION 16. Section 39.073(e), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (e) In determining a district's accreditation rating, the
 agency shall consider:
 (1) the district's current special education
 compliance status with the agency; and
 (2) the progress of students who have failed to
 perform satisfactorily in the preceding school year on benchmark
 [an] assessment instruments [instrument] required under Section
 39.0237 [39.023(a), (c), or (l)].
 SECTION 17. Section 39.075(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a) The commissioner shall authorize special accreditation
 investigations to be conducted:
 (1) when excessive numbers of absences of students
 eligible to be tested on state assessment instruments are
 determined;
 (2) when excessive numbers of allowable exemptions
 from the required state assessment instruments are determined;
 (3) in response to complaints submitted to the agency
 with respect to alleged violations of civil rights or other
 requirements imposed on the state by federal law or court order;
 (4) in response to established compliance reviews of
 the district's financial accounting practices and state and federal
 program requirements;
 (5) when extraordinary numbers of student placements
 in disciplinary alternative education programs, other than
 placements under Sections 37.006 and 37.007, are determined;
 (6) in response to an allegation involving a conflict
 between members of the board of trustees or between the board and
 the district administration if it appears that the conflict
 involves a violation of a role or duty of the board members or the
 administration clearly defined by this code;
 (7) when excessive numbers of students in special
 education programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 29, are assessed
 through benchmark assessment instruments developed or adopted
 under Section 39.0237(b) [39.023(b)];
 (8) in response to an allegation regarding or an
 analysis using a statistical method result indicating a possible
 violation of an assessment instrument security procedure
 established under Section 39.0301, including for the purpose of
 investigating or auditing a school district under that section; or
 (9) as the commissioner otherwise determines
 necessary.
 SECTION 18. Section 39.1324(b), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (b) The campus intervention team shall decide which
 educators may be retained at that campus. A principal who has been
 employed by the campus in that capacity during the full two-year
 period described by Subsection (a) may not be retained at that
 campus. A teacher of a subject assessed by an assessment
 instrument under Section 39.023 or a benchmark assessment
 instrument under Section 39.0237 may be retained only if the campus
 intervention team determines that a pattern exists of significant
 academic improvement by students taught by the teacher. If an
 educator is not retained, the educator may be assigned to another
 position in the district.
 SECTION 19. Section 39.182(a), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (a) Not later than December 1 of each year, the agency shall
 prepare and deliver to the governor, the lieutenant governor, the
 speaker of the house of representatives, each member of the
 legislature, the Legislative Budget Board, and the clerks of the
 standing committees of the senate and house of representatives with
 primary jurisdiction over the public school system a comprehensive
 report covering the preceding school year and containing:
 (1) an evaluation of the achievements of the state
 educational program in relation to the statutory goals for the
 public education system under Section 4.002;
 (2) an evaluation of the status of education in the
 state as reflected by the academic excellence indicators adopted
 under Section 39.051;
 (3) a summary compilation of overall student
 performance on academic skills assessment instruments required by
 Section 39.023 or benchmark assessment instruments required by
 Section 39.0237 with the number and percentage of students
 exempted from the administration of those instruments and the basis
 of the exemptions, aggregated by grade level, subject area, campus,
 and district, with appropriate interpretations and analysis, and
 disaggregated by [race,] ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic
 status;
 (4) a summary compilation of overall performance of
 students placed in a disciplinary alternative education program
 established under Section 37.008 on academic skills assessment
 instruments required by Section 39.023 or benchmark assessment
 instruments required by Section 39.0237 with the number of those
 students exempted from the administration of those instruments and
 the basis of the exemptions, aggregated by district, grade level,
 and subject area, with appropriate interpretations and analysis,
 and disaggregated by [race,] ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic
 status;
 (5) a summary compilation of overall performance of
 students at risk of dropping out of school, as defined by Section
 29.081(d), on academic skills assessment instruments required by
 Section 39.023 or benchmark assessment instruments required by
 Section 39.0237 with the number of those students exempted from the
 administration of those instruments and the basis of the
 exemptions, aggregated by district, grade level, and subject area,
 with appropriate interpretations and analysis, and disaggregated
 by [race,] ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status;
 (6) an evaluation of the correlation between student
 grades and student performance on academic skills assessment
 instruments required by Section 39.023 or benchmark assessment
 instruments required by Section 39.0237;
 (7) a statement of the dropout rate of students in
 grade levels 7 through 12, expressed in the aggregate and by grade
 level, and a statement of the completion rates of students for grade
 levels 9 through 12;
 (8) a statement of:
 (A) the completion rate of students who enter
 grade level 9 and graduate not more than four years later;
 (B) the completion rate of students who enter
 grade level 9 and graduate, including students who require more
 than four years to graduate;
 (C) the completion rate of students who enter
 grade level 9 and not more than four years later receive a high
 school equivalency certificate;
 (D) the completion rate of students who enter
 grade level 9 and receive a high school equivalency certificate,
 including students who require more than four years to receive a
 certificate; and
 (E) the number and percentage of all students who
 have not been accounted for under Paragraph (A), (B), (C), or (D);
 (9) a statement of the projected cross-sectional and
 longitudinal dropout rates for grade levels 9 through 12 for the
 next five years, assuming no state action is taken to reduce the
 dropout rate;
 (10) a description of a systematic, measurable plan
 for reducing the projected cross-sectional and longitudinal
 dropout rates to five percent or less for the 1997-1998 school year;
 (11) a summary of the information required by Section
 29.083 regarding grade level retention of students and information
 concerning:
 (A) the number and percentage of students
 retained; and
 (B) the performance of retained students on
 benchmark assessment instruments required under Section 39.0237(a)
 [39.023(a)];
 (12) information, aggregated by district type and
 disaggregated by [race,] ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic
 status, on:
 (A) the number of students placed in a
 disciplinary alternative education program established under
 Section 37.008;
 (B) the average length of a student's placement
 in a disciplinary alternative education program established under
 Section 37.008;
 (C) the academic performance of students on
 benchmark assessment instruments required under Section 39.0237(a)
 [39.023(a)] during the year preceding and during the year following
 placement in a disciplinary alternative education program; and
 (D) the dropout rates of students who have been
 placed in a disciplinary alternative education program established
 under Section 37.008;
 (13) a list of each school district or campus that does
 not satisfy performance standards, with an explanation of the
 actions taken by the commissioner to improve student performance in
 the district or campus and an evaluation of the results of those
 actions;
 (14) an evaluation of the status of the curriculum
 taught in public schools, with recommendations for legislative
 changes necessary to improve or modify the curriculum required by
 Section 28.002;
 (15) a description of all funds received by and each
 activity and expenditure of the agency;
 (16) a summary and analysis of the instructional
 expenditures ratios and instructional employees ratios of school
 districts computed under Section 44.0071;
 (17) a summary of the effect of deregulation,
 including exemptions and waivers granted under Section 7.056 or
 39.112;
 (18) a statement of the total number and length of
 reports that school districts and school district employees must
 submit to the agency, identifying which reports are required by
 federal statute or rule, state statute, or agency rule, and a
 summary of the agency's efforts to reduce overall reporting
 requirements;
 (19) a list of each school district that is not in
 compliance with state special education requirements, including:
 (A) the period for which the district has not
 been in compliance;
 (B) the manner in which the agency considered the
 district's failure to comply in determining the district's
 accreditation status; and
 (C) an explanation of the actions taken by the
 commissioner to ensure compliance and an evaluation of the results
 of those actions;
 (20) a comparison of the performance of
 open-enrollment charter schools and school districts on the
 academic excellence indicators specified in Section 39.051(b) and
 accountability measures adopted under Section 39.051(g), with a
 separately aggregated comparison of the performance of
 open-enrollment charter schools predominantly serving students at
 risk of dropping out of school, as defined by Section 29.081(d),
 with the performance of school districts;
 (21) a summary of the information required by Section
 38.0141 regarding student health and physical activity from each
 school district;
 (22) a summary compilation of overall student
 performance under the assessment system developed to evaluate the
 longitudinal academic progress as required by Section 39.027(e),
 disaggregated by bilingual education or special language program
 instructional model, if any; and
 (23) any additional information considered important
 by the commissioner or the State Board of Education.
 SECTION 20. Section 42.003(d), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (d) Notwithstanding Subsection (a), a student younger than
 five years of age is entitled to the benefits of the Foundation
 School Program if:
 (1) the student performs satisfactorily on the
 benchmark assessment instruments [instrument] administered under
 Section 39.0237(a) [39.023(a)] to students in the third grade; and
 (2) the district has adopted a policy for admitting
 students younger than five years of age.
 SECTION 21. Section 42.152(r), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (r) The commissioner shall grant a one-year exemption from
 the requirements of Subsections (q)-(q-4) to a school district in
 which the group of students who have failed to perform
 satisfactorily in the preceding school year on benchmark [an]
 assessment instruments [instrument] required under Section 39.0237
 [39.023(a), (c), or (l)] subsequently performs on those assessment
 instruments at a level that meets or exceeds a level prescribed by
 commissioner rule. Each year the commissioner, based on the most
 recent information available, shall determine if a school district
 is entitled to an exemption for the following school year and notify
 the district of that determination.
 SECTION 22. Section 28.006(c-1), Education Code, is
 repealed.
 SECTION 23. This Act applies beginning with the 2010-2011
 school year.
 SECTION 24. This Act takes effect immediately if it
 receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each
 house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution.
 If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate
 effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2009.