Texas House Bill HB3032

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/16/09
• Voted on by House: 4/29/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/12/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/15/09
• Governor Action: 5/27/09
• Enrolled: 5/18/09
• Passed: 5/27/09

Caption

Relating to the sale of certain property at Possum Kingdom Lake by the Brazos River Authority.

Impact

The bill represents a significant shift in property management for the Brazos River Authority, streamlining the sale process for parcels located in high-demand areas. By allowing property owners the first opportunity to purchase adjacent lands, the bill seeks to promote local ownership and consolidate property under fewer owners, potentially enhancing community involvement in land management and usage. Moreover, the Authority is given a level of flexibility in how it can use the proceeds from these sales, further embedding the financial viability of their operations.

Summary

House Bill 3032 pertains to the sale of certain properties at Possum Kingdom Lake by the Brazos River Authority. It designates specific parcels of land, which are surrounded by private property and located above the 1000-foot mean sea level contour line, as 'Captive Property To Be Sold.' The bill mandates that these parcels be sold at fair market value to the surrounding property owners, referred to as 'Offerees.' The Authority is required to publish a list of these properties and establish a process by which interested parties can express their intent to purchase within a stipulated timeframe.

Contention

Notably, while HB3032 facilitates property sales, it may raise concerns regarding the rights of non-offering residents or potential buyers. Critics might argue that prioritizing existing property owners can exacerbate socioeconomic disparities, particularly if surrounding properties are held by wealthier individuals or interests. There is also the potential for disputes over fair market valuations, as the bill's language determines that such disputes will be handled in the Travis County district court, thereby institutionalizing a specific venue for resolution and potentially limiting access to justice for some parties involved.