Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB3136

Filed
 
Out of House Committee
4/17/09  
Voted on by House
5/1/09  
Out of Senate Committee
5/22/09  
Voted on by Senate
5/27/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/29/09  

Caption

Relating to the purposes for which certain counties may use local hotel occupancy tax revenue.

Impact

The enactment of HB 3136 is expected to have a significant impact on local economic development and environmental stewardship in counties impacted by the Edwards Aquifer. By earmarking a large portion of hotel occupancy tax revenue for tourism promotion, these counties will likely work to enhance their attractiveness as tourist destinations. Concurrently, the requirements for environmental cleanup and maintenance of public spaces will likely lead to improved conditions in natural resources that attract visitors, potentially contributing to a cyclic benefit in tourism and local amenities.

Summary

House Bill 3136 introduces amendments to the Texas Tax Code regarding the utilization of local hotel occupancy tax revenues by counties situated within the boundaries of the Edwards Aquifer Authority. The bill specifies that these counties may allocate 75 percent of their hotel occupancy tax revenue explicitly for the promotion of tourism. The remaining 25 percent must be directed towards environmental initiatives, including the removal of trash and litter from state-owned rivers and riverbeds situated within the counties' boundaries, alongside maintaining litter containers in these areas. This dual purpose aims to encourage tourism while promoting environmental health.

Contention

Though the primary goals of HB 3136 involve tourism development and environmental cleanup, there may be points of contention around how the bill's implementation is monitored and how effectively these funds will be managed. Critics may argue that while promoting tourism is vital, there should be a safeguard against mismanagement of the funds intended for environmental programs. Additionally, discussions around the priority of tourism versus other local needs may arise, particularly in assessing if sufficient resources will be allocated to environmental challenges that counties face beyond litter and trash removal.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.