Texas House Bill HB319

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Filed: 11/20/08
• Out of House Committee: 4/15/09
• Voted on by House: 5/7/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/23/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/30/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to an exemption from jury service for certain persons with legal custody of a child.

Impact

The impact of HB 319 on state law involves a modification to the existing jury service exemption criteria outlined in Section 62.106(a) of the Government Code. It is an incremental change that enhances the current provisions relating to jury service exemptions for those who are over the age of 70, students, or caregivers. This broader scope is particularly beneficial as it acknowledges the increasing number of custodial caregivers in the community, thereby ensuring a more flexible and practical approach to jury duty participation.

Summary

House Bill 319 amends the Texas Government Code to provide a specific exemption from jury service for individuals with legal custody of a child younger than 15 years of age. The bill recognizes the challenges faced by these individuals when summoned for jury duty, particularly regarding the need for adequate supervision of the child. By allowing exemptions, the bill aims to alleviate potential hardships for custodial parents and guardians, ensuring that their responsibilities towards children do not conflict with civic duties.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 319 seeks to enhance the legal framework surrounding jury duty exemptions in Texas by specifically addressing the needs of custodial parents or legal guardians. The bill reflects a growing recognition of family responsibilities and the necessity for legal provisions that accommodate such realities while maintaining the integrity of the judicial system.

Contention

Though the bill focuses on easing the burdens of custody on potential jurors, there may be discussions regarding the balance between fulfilling civic duties and providing necessary family care. Some may argue that providing such exemptions could hinder the jury pool and affect the justice system's functionality. The emphasis on child custody as a reason for exemption could also prompt additional inquiries into who qualifies as a legal custodian and the implications it has in terms of jury representation.