Texas House Bill HB3491

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/27/09
• Voted on by House: 5/1/09

Caption

Relating to the creation, administration, powers, and duties of a county assistance district.

Impact

One significant impact of HB 3491 is its empowerment of county commissioners' courts to call elections for the creation of these districts. This shift will allow for tailored solutions to local needs, including road construction, law enforcement services, and public health services. Moreover, by defining the boundaries and potential tax rates that can be applied, the bill establishes a framework that promotes economic development and tourism while ensuring that local governments can finance necessary operations based on the specific needs of their communities. Maintaining a limit on combined local sales and use taxes is also an important aspect of the bill that serves to prevent excessive tax burdens on local residents.

Summary

House Bill 3491 focuses on the creation, administration, powers, and duties of county assistance districts within the state of Texas. The bill amends provisions under the Local Government Code to provide counties with enhanced authority to establish such districts. The districts aim to provide essential services and fund various community needs through local sales and use taxes collected within their jurisdictions. By allowing counties to create multiple assistance districts, the bill seeks to diversify support for public services and infrastructure improvements tailored to local community requirements.

Contention

Notable points of contention around HB 3491 may arise from differing opinions on fiscal responsibility and local governance. Proponents argue that the financial tools provided through the establishment of county assistance districts can enhance community welfare and promote economic growth. However, opponents might raise concerns about the potential for increased local taxation and how it could impact low-income residents. Debate may also focus on the appropriateness of local governments having control over taxation and the scrutiny of how funds will be allocated and used. Any opposition to the bill could be centered on the fear of unintended consequences stemming from increased local authority.