Texas House Bill HB4004

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/3/09
• Voted on by House: 4/16/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 4/29/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/12/09
• Governor Action: 5/23/09
• Enrolled: 5/14/09
• Passed: 5/23/09

Caption

Relating to the management and control of certain utility systems.

Impact

The changes introduced by HB 4004 could significantly affect how utility services are managed across various municipalities. The bill aims to streamline operations and potentially improve service delivery by allowing local governments to opt for a governance model that best serves their constituents. By enabling the formation of boards of trustees with specific population criteria, the bill ensures that larger municipalities can have a dedicated oversight mechanism that may better address the complexities of managing utility systems in densely populated areas.

Summary

House Bill 4004 proposes amendments to the management and control of utility systems in Texas. The bill allows for flexibility in the governance of these systems, permitting municipalities to choose between managing them through their governing body or a board of trustees. This board may consist of up to five members, including the mayor, or, in larger counties (with populations exceeding 600,000 along the international border), up to seven members, also including the mayor. Such structure aims to enhance efficiency in utility management by providing local authorities with governance options that suit their specific needs.

Contention

Key points of contention surrounding HB 4004 may stem from concerns over accountability and oversight in the management of public utility services. Some representatives might argue that shifting control to smaller boards could dilute responsibility and oversight, potentially leading to mismanagement. Critics of the bill may advocate for retaining a more centralized approach to governance to ensure consistency and effectiveness in the utility management across different jurisdictions, while supporters argue that localized control will tailor utility governance to community-specific needs and enhance responsiveness.