Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB409

Filed
12/15/08  
Out of House Committee
4/15/09  
Voted on by House
4/24/09  
Out of Senate Committee
5/8/09  
Voted on by Senate
5/21/09  
Governor Action
6/19/09  
Bill Becomes Law
 
Enrolled
5/24/09  

Caption

Relating to an award of additional periods of possession of or access to a child for certain conservators who have returned from active military deployment.

Impact

The proposed changes in HB 409 are intended to ensure that military parents are not further disadvantaged in custody situations due to their service obligations. By mandating the court to calculate the possession periods that would have occurred during deployment and considering the best interests of the child, the bill aims to offer a more equitable approach to post-deployment parental access. The law underscores the importance of supporting military families in Texas, recognizing their unique challenges.

Summary

House Bill 409 focuses on amending the Texas Family Code to provide additional periods of possession or access to a child for conservators who have returned from active military deployment. The bill acknowledges the challenges faced by military personnel in maintaining parental relationships during deployment and seeks to address the potential for lost time with their children during this period. Specifically, the legislation allows conservators, defined as either possessory conservators or joint managing conservators, to petition the court for additional access or possession of their children after their deployment ends.

Conclusion

Overall, HB 409 represents a legislative effort to adapt family law for the realities faced by military families. By enshrining the right to request additional possession periods into law, the bill seeks to protect the rights of parents who serve in the military while emphasizing the need for continuity and stability in the lives of their children.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding HB 409 is the potential for disputes on what constitutes 'reasonable access' and the subjective interpretation of 'the best interest of the child.' Critics may argue that additional possession periods could disrupt established custody arrangements or complicate the dynamics between parents. Furthermore, there may be concerns regarding the practical implementation of this provision, as distinguishing which specific periods of possession should be awarded could lead to legal complications.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

TX HB3379

Relating to orders for the conservatorship of, possession of or access to, or support of a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX SB718

Relating to additional periods of possession of or access to a child to compensate for denial of court-ordered possession or access.

TX SB1702

Relating to orders providing for the conservatorship of or possession of and access to a child by the child's parents in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB1966

Relating to additional periods of possession of or access to a child to compensate for denial of court-ordered possession or access.

TX HB2948

Relating to the modification of a possession order and temporary possession of a child when a conservator of the child is incapacitated.

TX HB5220

Relating to certain beginning and ending times of possession under a standard possession order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB5221

Relating to certain beginning and ending times of possession under a standard possession order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB1120

Relating to orders for possession of and access to a child in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

TX HB1923

Relating to videoconferencing with a child by the child's possessory conservator.

TX HB120

Relating to the terms and conditions of a standard possession order in a suit affecting the parent-child relationship.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.