Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

Texas House Bill HB4325

Voted on by House
 
Out of Senate Committee
 
Voted on by Senate
 
Governor Action
 
Bill Becomes Law
 

Caption

Relating to the creation of a Sunny Day Fund to attract competitive federal grants to Texas under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Impact

The implementation of HB4325 could significantly enhance Texas's ability to secure federal resources for various development projects within the state. By providing matching grants, the legislation incentivizes local entities to apply for federal grants, potentially leading to an influx of financial resources that could be utilized to improve infrastructure, healthcare, education, and other vital services. However, the termination of the fund is planned for December 31, 2010, necessitating careful planning to ensure that the funds are utilized effectively before their expiration.

Summary

House Bill 4325 proposes the establishment of the Texas Recovery and Reinvestment Fund, commonly referred to as the Sunny Day Fund, which aims to attract and facilitate competitive federal grants for investments in Texas. This fund is designated as a dedicated account within the Texas Economic Stabilization Fund and includes a starting deposit of $1 billion, along with any additional state appropriations and grants. The primary goal of the fund is to provide matching grants to entities that successfully obtain federal funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

Conclusion

Overall, HB4325 represents an effort to bolster economic growth in Texas through strategic funding initiatives linked to federal resources. The success of such legislation will depend on collaboration between state and local entities and the effective execution of the proposed funding mechanisms, which are designed to capitalize on available federal opportunities.

Contention

There may be concerns surrounding the management and distribution of the funds granted under this bill. As the administration of the fund is under the purview of the governor's office, questions regarding oversight, accountability, and the criteria used to prioritize grant applications could arise. Additionally, the stipulations surrounding capital improvements funded by the grants, such as the repayment of funds if sold, might draw reactions from stakeholders who fear it could discourage investment or complicate funding processes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.