Texas House Bill HB4409

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/28/09
• Voted on by House: 5/6/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/23/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/28/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 6/2/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to emergency preparation and management.

Impact

The amendments introduced by HB 4409 would strengthen the operational coordination among various state agencies during disasters. Specifically, it mandates the General Land Office and other departments to contract services for essential activities such as debris removal and the provision of temporary housing. By formalizing these procedures, the bill seeks to ensure a more efficient response mechanism during emergencies, making it easier to mobilize resources and manage logistics effectively.

Summary

House Bill 4409 focuses on enhancing the state's emergency preparation and management framework. The bill proposes several amendments to the Government Code, emphasizing the roles and responsibilities of both state and local agencies during disaster situations. One key aspect is the recognition of volunteers and agency employees involved in disaster response by classifying them as members of the state military when executing duties associated with sheltering evacuees. This provision aims to clarify their civil status and responsibilities under emergency conditions.

Conclusion

In essence, HB 4409 aims to enhance the statutory framework for disaster management in Texas by improving coordination and delineating the roles of public servants and volunteers involved in such efforts. By addressing these areas, the bill is crafted to foster a rapid and organized response to disasters and minimize liabilities for those stepping in to assist during emergencies.

Contention

Notably, discussions around HB 4409 suggest different viewpoints regarding the extent and implementation of these amendments. Supporters argue that the bill will unify and streamline disaster management efforts across the state, promoting a comprehensive preparedness strategy. Critics, however, may express concerns over potential bureaucratic hurdles introduced by these new regulations, fearing they could delay timely disaster response or impose additional burdens on local agencies trying to enact swift measures tailored to their community's specific needs.