Texas House Bill HB4465

Texas 2009 - 81st Regular

• Out of House Committee: 4/17/09
• Voted on by House: 5/1/09
• Out of Senate Committee: 5/18/09
• Voted on by Senate: 5/26/09
• Governor Action: 6/19/09
• Enrolled: 5/28/09
• Passed: 6/19/09

Caption

Relating to "Welcome to Texas" signs on highways entering Texas and to the placement of Texas flags at international ports-of-entry.

Impact

The bill aims to enhance Texas's image as a welcoming state for travelers and visitors, particularly those entering from bordering states or countries. By creating distinctive signage and ensuring large, visible Texas flags at international ports, HB4465 seeks to promote a sense of state identity and pride. This legislative move could potentially influence tourism and the overall visitor experience in the state, as the presence of well-maintained signs and flags may positively impact the first impressions of people arriving in Texas.

Summary

House Bill 4465 focuses on the installation and maintenance of 'Welcome to Texas' signs at state boundaries and the display of Texas flags at international ports-of-entry. The bill mandates the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to design and implement signage that reflects the state's hospitality and pride. It stipulates that signs at highways entering Texas must feature the Texas state flag and include slogans such as 'Drive Friendly - The Texas Way.' Furthermore, the bill introduces provisions for including a historical note about Texas presidents, which would be dynamically updated based on the current president's residency status in Texas.

Contention

While the bill appears straightforward, points of contention might arise concerning the costs associated with erecting these signs and flags, as well as the logistics of maintenance. Some may argue that these funds could be better allocated to pressing infrastructure projects or public services. Furthermore, discussions could unfold regarding the necessity of highlighting specific presidents, as this aspect might be interpreted as politicizing state symbols. Overall, while the bill is not highly controversial, its implementation may evoke debates regarding state spending priorities.